Abstract
It is often assumed that word reading proceeds automatically. Here, we tested this assumption by recording event-related potentials during a psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm, requiring lexical decisions about written words. Specifically, we selected words differing in their orthographic neighborhood size–the number of words that can be obtained from a target by exchanging a single letter–and investigated how influences of this variable depend on the availability of central attention. As expected, when attentional resources for lexical decisions were unconstrained, words with many orthographic neighbors elicited larger N400 amplitudes than those with few neighbors. However, under conditions of high temporal overlap with a high priority primary task, the N400 effect was not statistically different from zero. This finding indicates strong attentional influences on processes sensitive to orthographic neighbors during word reading, providing novel evidence against the full automaticity of processes involved in word reading. Furthermore, in conjunction with the observation of an underadditive interaction between stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) and orthographic neighborhood size in lexical decision performance, commonly taken to indicate automaticity, our results raise issues concerning the standard logic of cognitive slack in the PRP paradigm.
Highlights
Word reading is a highly overlearned every-day activity, and is widely assumed to proceed automatically
Responses deviating more than two standard deviations from mean RT per participant and condition were treated as outliers
RT results show a significant three-way interaction between stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA), lexicality, and orthographic neighbors (ON), F1 (1, 23) = 6.14, p < .05, F2 (1, 844) = 8.30, p < .01. This three-way interaction reflects a decrease of the influence of ON with high task overlap (SOA 100); this influence was of opposite direction for words and pseudowords: For word stimuli there was facilitation for words with many ON at the long SOA, F1 (1, 23) = 4.24, p < .05, F2 (1, 418) = 7.64, p < .05, but not at the short SOA, F1 < 1, F2 < 1
Summary
Word reading is a highly overlearned every-day activity, and is widely assumed to proceed automatically (see e.g., the vast majority of textbooks). Automatic word processing is implicitly assumed in many models of visual word recognition Attentional modulation of orthographic neighborhood effects during reading. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness (http://www.mineco.gob.es/ portal/site/mineco/) to CJA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.