Abstract
The purpose of this paper was to explore performance by 8 men, 18 to 35 years old, on a task of visual-coincidence judgment using a tennis ball as a stimulus. Focus on attentional demands in different viewing conditions (total vs partial vision) at different points along the ball's path served to assess relative demands. The findings indicate that interference between the visual coincidence task and the probe task was constant across conditions and was weakly differentiated across problem positions. This supports the assumption that the timing process rests upon a higher mechanism.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
