Abstract

ObjectivesObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with an increased motor vehicle accident (MVA) risk. Conventional measures of OSA severity do not predict individual risk. Cognitive function tests have failed to incorporate outcomes in risk prediction. We aimed to identify markers of cognitive function for MVA risk prediction in OSA. MethodsOSA patients [n = 114, 75% male, median age 51 (43–61) years, body mass index (BMI) 30 (27–33) kg/m2, apnea–hypopnea index 25 (6–49) n/h, and Epworth Sleepiness (ESS) score 11 (8–16)] were recruited from a sleep laboratory. Two cognitive function tests, the Attention Network Test (ANT) and a modified Oxford Sleep Resistance Test (OSLER) test (GOSLING), were assessed. ResultsOSA patients with (n = 11) or without (n = 103) a MVA record in the Swedish traffic accident registry were identified. In patients with a MVA, 64% were commercial drivers. In patients with a MVA history, more lapses [42 (5–121) vs. 5 (1–25), P = 0.02] and fewer responses [238 (158–272) vs. 271 (256–277), P = 0.03] to stimuli in the ANT were found. In the GOSLING, the number of lapses was higher (29 (10–97) vs. 7 (2–19), P = 0.01) and the reaction time was longer [462 (393–551) vs. 407 (361–449) ms, P = 0.05]. OSA severity and ESS score poorly predicted MVAs (P > 0.2). ConclusionsWe have demonstrated that deficit in sustained attention, assessed by daytime neurocognitive function tests, was associated with MVA risk in OSA patients. We were unable to detect an association between MVA history and severity of OSA or the ESS score. The findings provide a rationale for further development of objective MVA risk assessment tools in OSA.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.