Abstract

In our daily life, we continually exploit already learned multisensory associations and form new ones when facing novel situations. Improving our associative learning results in higher cognitive capabilities. We experimentally and computationally studied the learning performance of healthy subjects in a visual-auditory sensory associative learning task across active learning, attention cueing learning, and passive learning modes. According to our results, the learning mode had no significant effect on learning association of congruent pairs. In addition, subjects’ performance in learning congruent samples was not correlated with their vigilance score. Nevertheless, vigilance score was significantly correlated with the learning performance of the non-congruent pairs. Moreover, in the last block of the passive learning mode, subjects significantly made more mistakes in taking non-congruent pairs as associated and consciously reported lower confidence. These results indicate that attention and activity equally enhanced visual-auditory associative learning for non-congruent pairs, while false alarm rate in the passive learning mode did not decrease after the second block. We investigated the cause of higher false alarm rate in the passive learning mode by using a computational model, composed of a reinforcement learning module and a memory-decay module. The results suggest that the higher rate of memory decay is the source of making more mistakes and reporting lower confidence in non-congruent pairs in the passive learning mode.

Highlights

  • We observe the world through our multisensory system and require sensory associations across different senses play a vital role in perceiving our environment and performing high-levelPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0157680 June 17, 2016Effect of Attention Cueing and Activity on Multisensory Association Learning cognitive activities

  • Results revealed that the effect of the learning mode on false alarm rate is significant in the first block (F(2,46) = 3.96, p = 0.025) and in the last block (F(2,46) = 5.91, p = 0.0051)

  • Post-hoc Tukey test showed no significant difference between active learning (AL) and Attention Cueing Learning (ACL) (p = 0.62), AL and passive learning (PL) (p = 0.15), and ACL and PL (p = 0.055)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We observe the world through our multisensory system and require sensory associations across different senses play a vital role in perceiving our environment and performing high-level. Effect of Attention Cueing and Activity on Multisensory Association Learning cognitive activities. Multisensory associative learning is one of the important requirements for multisensory perception. According to one of the recent studies [1], multisensory perception is not an automatic feature-binding process and it requires an associative learning process. The learning of multisensory associations can even influence low-level sensory processing in a top-down approach[2,3]. It is expected that any improvement in multisensory associative learning would enhance our perception and cognitive abilities [4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call