Abstract

In this study, we examined different models of cognitive control in dynamic time-sharing situations. We investigated attentional allocation by registering participants’ eye movements while they performed a new time-sharing task that forced them to solve resource conflicts between subtasks through prioritization. Participants were monitoring four subtasks each requiring different amounts of visual attention and response frequencies. Participants’ attention allocation was operationalized in terms of the time spent dwelling on subtasks, the rate they visually sampled the tasks, and the duration of dwells. Additionally, the accuracy of responses and efficiency of time-sharing were estimated. In Experiment 1, we studied adaptation to a time-sharing environment in which priority order of the subtasks was kept constant from trial to trial. We found that the participants sampled the most important subtasks more frequently, spent more time on them, and shifted their gaze earlier to them than to less important subtasks. That is, they allocated their attention according to the subtask priorities. In Experiment 2, subtask priorities changed from trial to trial. Despite the higher demands of the constantly changing situation, participants again adapted to the varying priorities of the subtasks almost instantly. Our results suggest that performance in complex and dynamic time-sharing situations is not managed by a system relying on liberal resource allocation policies and gradual learning. Instead, the participants’ rapid adaptation is more consistent with tighter executive and authoritative control and intelligent use of prioritization information.

Highlights

  • Situations where several overlapping subtasks must be performed under time pressure are common in many everyday activities

  • Threaded cognition’s most fundamental proposition is that there is no need in time-sharing for executive control in resource allocation

  • Tasks adjust their urgencies gradually according to the feedback they get from the correspondence of received resources and the goal of the task

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Situations where several overlapping subtasks must be performed under time pressure are common in many everyday activities. When drivers approach a busy intersection, they must glean potentially relevant information from several sources: other vehicles, pedestrians, and traffic signs through the windshield, monitor speed on the speedometer, and navigate the car by memorized or displayed map. These subtasks cannot be done simultaneously, as they all occupy the same, visual, channel. Drivers must focus on the most important task at any given time and allocate their attention to it at the cost of not attending to other, less important, tasks (i.e., perform subtask prioritization). As situations may change very quickly, the operators have to immediately perceive and understand the changed subtask

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call