Abstract

This paper studies how to attain fairness in communication for omniscience that models the multi-terminal compress sensing problem and the coded cooperative data exchange problem where a set of users exchange their observations of a discrete multiple random source to attain omniscience—the state that all users recover the entire source. The optimal rate region containing all source coding rate vectors that achieve omniscience with the minimum sum rate is shown to coincide with the core (the solution set) of a coalitional game. Two game-theoretic fairness solutions are studied: the Shapley value and the egalitarian solution. It is shown that the Shapley value assigns each user the source coding rate measured by their remaining information of the multiple source given the common randomness that is shared by all users, while the egalitarian solution simply distributes the rates as evenly as possible in the core. To avoid the exponentially growing complexity of obtaining the Shapley value, a polynomial-time approximation method is proposed which utilizes the fact that the Shapley value is the mean value over all extreme points in the core. In addition, a steepest descent algorithm is proposed that converges in polynomial time on the fractional egalitarian solution in the core, which can be implemented by network coding schemes. Finally, it is shown that the game can be decomposed into subgames so that both the Shapley value and the egalitarian solution can be obtained within each subgame in a distributed manner with reduced complexity.

Highlights

  • The communication for omniscience (CO) problem is formulated in [1]

  • Based on an optimality criterion for the egalitarian solution stating that the local optimum implies the global optimum, we show that the estimation sequence generated by the steepest descent algorithm (SDA) converges in the fractional egalitarian solution in O(|P ∗ | · L(V ) · |V | · submodular function minimization (SFM)(|V |)) time, where L(V ) is the maximum1 -norm over all pairs of points in the optimal rate region

  • The Shapley value differs from the egalitarian solution in that the fairness is attained if each user i is penalized by the expected marginal cost or source coding rate H ( X t {i }|U ) − H ( X |U ) he/she incurs if in coalition X

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The communication for omniscience (CO) problem is formulated in [1]. It is assumed that there are a finite number of users in a system that are indexed by the set V. CO was cast into the coded cooperative data exchange (CCDE) problem [5–7], in which the users are mobile clients broadcasting linear combinations of packets over noiseless peer-to-peer (P2P) wireless channels and the communication rates are restricted to being integral. One main optimization problem that arises in CO is how to minimize the overall source coding rate to attain omniscience. The main purpose of this paper is to study how to attain fairness in the optimal rate region for the CO problem, where the broadcast rates are not constrained to be integer-valued. This decomposition leads to a distributed computation method for fairness and reduces the complexity

Summary of Main Results
Organization
Communication for Omniscience
Preliminaries
Fairness
Decomposable Coalitional Game
Coalition Game Model
Decomposition
Shapley Value
Complexity and Approximation
Egalitarian Solution
Steepest Descent Algorithm
Dependence Function
Complexity and Distributed Implementation
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.