Abstract
Atrocity has gained a disquieting prominence in the US since the advent of the “war on terror.” A quarter of a century ago, when torture and “disappearance” characterized the worst face of authoritarian regimes in the Southern Cone and of political conflict in Central America, who would have guessed that Congress, Federal courts, and the executive branch of the US would publicly and earnestly debate the legitimacy and legality of these practices at home? In order to finesse US law, “enhanced interrogation techniques” and suspension of habeas corpus have been institutionalized offshore. Nonetheless, torture in particular has entered public consciousness as a practice that takes place inside the boundaries of American political life. The Fox TV espionage/thriller series 24 both registers this shift and dramatizes a rationale for torture at the hands of counter-terrorism agents. To the extent that the television still symbolically occupies pride of place in the American living room, 24 brings torture not only into the homeland but also into the home. As recognition grows that torture is not merely a practice of medieval lords, fascists, totalitarian communists, and shadowy, repressive dictators in remote national capitals, we must expand our reckoning with torture as a practice of modern, liberal, democratic societies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.