Atrial Fibrillation Treatment Adequacy and Outcome after Endovascular Thrombectomy

Abstract

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) often leads to large vessel occlusions (LVO) which may necessitate endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Whether the adequacy of treatment with oral anticoagulants (OAC) prior to LVO modifies outcomes remains unknown. Patients and MethodsConsecutive EVT-treated LVO patients were recruited and the data was analyzed retrospectively. We combined patients with known AF that were untreated with OAC or inadequately treated with those with new-onset AF to form a group of undertreated-AF patients and compared them to adequately treated AF patients. ResultsOf the 230 patients included, 109 (47%) had AF (86 known AF, 23 new-onset AF). AF patients were significantly older and more often reached favorable recanalization but less often had favorable outcomes compared to those without AF. Most patients with known AF (76%) were inadequately treated at stroke onset. Patients with undertreated-AF more often received tPA prior to EVT (26% vs. 4% p=0.009), more often had favorable collaterals (65% vs. 33% p<0.001) and more often reached favorable outcomes (28% vs. 9%, p=0.047) compared to adequately treated AF patients. On multivariate analyses adequately treated AF did not impact survival (Odds Ration [OR] 0.89 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.23-3.43), chances for favorable recanalization (OR 0.57 95%CI 0.15-2.13) or favorable outcome (OR 5.95 95%CI 0.62-57.39). ConclusionsTreatment adequacy does not affect the rates of favorable functional outcome or survival in AF patients with LVO.