Abstract
Twelve-lead electrocardiogram with cardiologist back-up is the usual way to differentiate sinus rhythm (SR) from atrial fibrillation or flutter (AFF). However, many facilities without on-site specialists rely on automated electrocardiogram (aECG). Mobile handheld devices are increasingly used for ambulatory screening strategies. Real-time comparisons between these methods in clinical practice are scant. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of aECG and KARDIAMobile device (1 and 6-lead modes) with cardiologist back-up for the diagnosis of AFF.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
