Abstract

ABSTRACTMolecular dynamics simulations, which take place on the atomistic scale, are now being used to predict the influence of atomistic processes on macro-scale mechanical properties. However, there is a lack of clear understanding on which potential should be used when attempting to obtain these properties. Moreover, many MD studies that do test mechanical properties do not actually simulate the macro-scale laboratory tension tests used to obtain them. As such, the purpose of the current study was to evaluate the various types of potentials for their accuracy in predicting the mechanical properties of iron from an atomistic uniaxial tension test at room temperature. Results demonstrated that while EAM and MEAM potentials all under predicted the elastic modulus at room temperature, the Tersoff and ReaxFF potentials were significantly more accurate. Unlike EAM and MEAM, both the Tersoff and ReaxFF potentials are bond order based. Therefore, these results demonstrate the importance of considering bonding between atoms when modelling tensile tests. In addition, the ReaxFF potential also accurately predicted the Poisson's ratio, allowing for complete characterisation of the material's behaviour. Overall, these findings highlight the need to understand the capabilities and limitations of each potential before application to a problem outside of the initial intended use.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.