Abstract

Lattice strain, crystallite shape and the crystallite size distribution in nanocrystalline diamond were determined from powder diffraction data. The data were analyzed by the direct space PDF method in combination with Molecular Dynamics simulations. Experimental Pair Distribution Functions were obtained from the large Q neutron diffraction data. Lattice strains were determined by comparison of the atomic pair distances at different length scales. The experimental pair-distance data were matched against the Molecular Dynamics models of diamond nanograins. Lattice relaxation at the surface and in the bulk of the simulated nanodiamond grains varied with their shape and size. Comparison of the model data to the experimentally determined strain characteristics yielded accurate information on the structure of the actual nanodiamond powders. In the as-synthesized nanodiamond the grains are polyhedrons predominantly terminated by (100) and (111) surfaces. Upon annealing the (111) surfaces with one dangling bond per atom graphitize and transform into surfaces with three dangling bond per atom. In the samples annealed at 1200 °C all grains are octahedrons terminated only by three dangling bond (111) surfaces. The mechanism of the atom rearrangement during the transformation of the (111) diamond surface into a graphite double-sheet was proposed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.