Abstract

The quinoprotein aromatic amine dehydrogenase (AADH) uses a covalently bound tryptophan tryptophylquinone (TTQ) cofactor to oxidatively deaminate primary aromatic amines. Recent crystal structures have provided insight into the reductive half-reaction. In contrast, no atomic details are available for the oxidative half-reaction. The TTQ O7 hydroxyl group is protonated during reduction, but it is unclear how this proton can be removed during the oxidative half-reaction. Furthermore, compared with the electron transfer from the N-quinol form, electron transfer from the non-physiological O-quinol form to azurin is significantly slower. Here we report crystal structures of the O-quinol, N-quinol, and N-semiquinone forms of AADH. A comparison of oxidized and substrate reduced AADH species reveals changes in the TTQ-containing subunit, extending from residues in the immediate vicinity of the N-quinol to the putative azurin docking site, suggesting a mechanism whereby TTQ redox state influences interprotein electron transfer. In contrast, chemical reduction of the TTQ center has no significant effect on protein conformation. Furthermore, structural reorganization upon substrate reduction places a water molecule near TTQ O7 where it can act as proton acceptor. The structure of the N-semiquinone, however, is essentially similar to oxidized AADH. Surprisingly, in the presence of substrate a covalent N-semiquinone substrate adduct is observed. To our knowledge this is the first detailed insight into a complex, branching mechanism of quinone oxidation where significant structural reorganization upon reduction of the quinone center directly influences formation of the electron transfer complex and nature of the electron transfer process.

Highlights

  • aromatic amine dehydrogenase (AADH) is specific for phenylethylamines and reacts with primary aliphatic amines, to a lesser extent [2, 3]

  • Superposition of the structures of AADH and methylamine dehydrogenase (MADH) (PDB code 1MDA [25]) reveals that the structural similarity between the two enzymes extends over the entire length of the proteins (Fig. 2)

  • Alignment of the ␣␤ dimers of AADH and MADH reveals that 347 C␣ atoms can be superimposed with an r.m.s.d

Read more

Summary

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for all structures were collected at cryogenic temperatures on European Synchrotron Radiation Facility stations ID14-1, Protein Purification and Preparation of Crystals—AADH 14-2, and 14-4 (Grenoble, France). Data oxidized form as previously described [4, 15]. Phases for the refinement of the form A structures were calculated using the structure of the oxidized AADH ((15) Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank (PDB) code 2AH1). Model building and refinement were carried out using programs TURBO-FRODO [21] and REFMAC [22]. The form B crystal structure was solved by molecular replacement technique (program AmoRe [23]) using the structure of the oxidized enzyme as a search model. Atomic coordinates and structure factors for the form A and form B structures of tryptamine-reduced AADH and of dithionite-reduced and dithionite-reduced/tryptamine-soaked AADH as well as the benzylamine N-semiquinone adduct have been deposited in the RSCB Protein Data Bank under accession codes 2iur, 2iuv, 2iup, 2iuq, and 2hxc, respectively

RESULTS
Refinement statistics
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call