Abstract

Brain–computer interfaces (BCI) have traditionally worked using synchronous paradigms. In recent years, much effort has been put into reaching asynchronous management, providing users with the ability to decide when a command should be selected. However, to the best of our knowledge, entropy metrics have not yet been explored. The present study has a twofold purpose: (i) to characterize both control and non-control states by examining the regularity of electroencephalography (EEG) signals; and (ii) to assess the efficacy of a scaled version of the sample entropy algorithm to provide asynchronous control for BCI systems. Ten healthy subjects participated in the study, who were asked to spell words through a visual oddball-based paradigm, attending (i.e., control) and ignoring (i.e., non-control) the stimuli. An optimization stage was performed for determining a common combination of hyperparameters for all subjects. Afterwards, these values were used to discern between both states using a linear classifier. Results show that control signals are more complex and irregular than non-control ones, reaching an average accuracy of in classification. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the proposed framework is useful in monitoring the attention of a user, and granting the asynchrony of the BCI system.

Highlights

  • Brain–computer interfaces (BCI) are able to detect users’ intentions from brain signals and convert them into artificial commands that control an external device

  • False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction was applied to counteract the problem of multiple comparisons

  • Significant differences were found between control and non-control states using features derived from multiscale entropy (MSE) and sample entropy (SampEn)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brain–computer interfaces (BCI) are able to detect users’ intentions from brain signals and convert them into artificial commands that control an external device. BCI applications are intended to replace, restore, enhance, supplement, or improve the natural central-nervous-system activity of the user [1]. Such purposes make BCI systems especially suited for improving the quality of life of motor-disabled people, reducing their dependence, and favoring their social and labor integration. These disabilities may be caused by traumas, neurodegenerative diseases, muscle disorders, or any illness that impairs the neural pathways that control muscles or the muscles themselves [2]. Electric brain activity is recorded by placing a set of electrodes on the user’s scalp [2]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call