Abstract

We consider a set K = ⋃ n ∈ N K n of finite structures such that all members of K n have the same universe, the cardinality of which approaches ∞ as n → ∞ . Each structure in K may have a nontrivial underlying pregeometry and on each K n we consider a probability measure, either the uniform measure, or what we call the dimension conditional measure. The main questions are: What conditions imply that for every extension axiom φ , compatible with the defining properties of K , the probability that φ is true in a member of K n approaches 1 as n → ∞ ? And what conditions imply that this is not the case, possibly in the strong sense that the mentioned probability approaches 0 for some φ ? If each K n is the set of structures with universe { 1 , … , n } , in a fixed relational language, in which certain “forbidden” structures cannot be weakly embedded and K has the disjoint amalgamation property, then there is a condition (concerning the set of forbidden structures) which, if we consider the uniform measure, gives a dichotomy; i.e., the condition holds if and only if the answer to the first question is ‘yes’. In general, we do not obtain a dichotomy, but we do obtain a condition guaranteeing that the answer is ‘yes’ for the first question, as well as condition guaranteeing that the answer is ‘no’; and we give examples showing that in the gap between these conditions the answer may be either ‘yes’ or ‘no’. This analysis is made for both the uniform measure and for the dimension conditional measure. The later measure has a closer relation to random generation of structures and is more “generous” with respect to satisfiability of extension axioms. Random l -colour ed structures fall naturally into the framework discussed so far, but random l -colour able structures need further considerations. It is not the case that every extension axiom compatible with the class of l -colourable structures almost surely holds in an l -colourable structure. But a more restricted set of extension axioms turns out to hold almost surely, which allows us to prove a zero–one law for random l -colourable structures, using a probability measure which is derived from the dimension conditional measure, and, after further combinatorial considerations, also for the uniform probability measure.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.