Asymptomatic versus symptomatic metastatic breast cancer: Potential effects on prognosis and quality adjusted life years (QALYs).

Abstract

e13073 Background: After radical surgery for breast cancer, routine laboratory or imaging studies for metastases screening are not indicated in the absence of clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of recurrence. While the goal of therapy is the extension of survival and maintenance of quality of life (QOL), therapies themselves could induce adverse events, resulting in deterioration of QOL. We evaluated quality adjusted life years (QALYs), which is survival adjusted by QOL, of the patients with recurrent breast cancer retrospectively and adequate follow-up measures. Methods: Fifty seven patients with recurrent breast cancer who died already were included. Survival curves were partitioned into two health states: time with ≥ grade 2 chemotherapy-related toxicity (TOX) and time without toxicity (TWiST). QALYs were acquired as follows: QALYs = TWiST + 0.7 * TOX. We compared clinical factors in the patients between with (symptomatic group, n = 32) and without symptoms (asymptomatic group, n = 25). Results: The median age of the patient at diagnosis of recurrence was 57 years. Luminal (hormone receptors (HR) - and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) -), HER2 (HER2 +), triple negative (TN) (HR - and HER2 -), and unknown were 29, 7, 15, and 6 cases, respectively. The proportion of HER2 and TN was significantly higher in the symptomatic group than that in the asymptomatic group (58.6, 21.7 %, p < 0.05). 44.6 % of the patients had visceral metastases at diagnosis of recurrence and the proportions were not different between the groups. Although post recurrent survival (PRS) was shorter significantly in the symptomatic group (22.5, 42,0 months, p < 0.01), overall survival from diagnosis of primary breast cancer (OS) was identical (60.5, 91.0 months). Additionally, QALYs after recurrence was shorter in the symptomatic group (23.0, 41.1 months, p < 0.01) and QALYs from diagnosis of primary breast cancer was identical (58.7, 91.0 months). Conclusions: Although there was no significant difference in OS between the both groups, the duration of therapy received was longer in the symptomatic group. In the present study, we acquired limited information due to retrospective manner. Prospective evaluation of QALYs, including patient reported outcome and symptoms derived from cancer itself, would turn out adequate measures of follow-up after radical surgery for primary breast cancer.