Abstract

Several conceptual models have been proposed for the formation of flux transfer events (FTEs), including models based on reconnection at a single reconnection line (X line) and at multiple X lines. Two‐dimensional magnetohydrodynamic models have previously been used to simulate both scenarios and have found a tendency for FTEs generated by single X line reconnection to exhibit an asymmetry in the bipolar BN signature that is the major in situ signature of FTE structures, with the leading peak being substantially smaller than the trailing peak. On the other hand, simulated FTEs generated by multiple X line reconnection led to more symmetric signatures. We present a comparison of these simulation results with observations made at the Earth's magnetopause by the Cluster spacecraft, using a data set of 213 FTEs which were observed by all four spacecraft in 2002/2003 at the high‐latitude magnetopause near local noon and at low latitudes on the flanks, and 36 FTEs which were observed by one or more Cluster spacecraft near the subsolar point in 2007 and 2008. A tendency is found for the BN signatures to be asymmetric but with the leading peak larger in amplitude than the trailing peak, opposite to the prediction made by the 2‐D single X line simulations. This tendency is weaker in the subsolar FTEs. Therefore, the observations are not consistent with 2‐D MHD simulations of single X line reconnection. The signatures observed near the subsolar point are more consistent with those predicted by 2‐D simulations of multiple X line reconnection, although the multiple X line simulation studies did not report any net asymmetry. We propose that the observed asymmetry can be explained by a compression of magnetic flux ahead of the propagating FTE structure and a rarefaction behind it. The weaker tendency nearer the subsolar point is consistent with a weaker compression and rarefaction due to lower FTE velocities.

Highlights

  • [2] Flux transfer events (FTEs) are bursts of magnetic reconnection at the dayside magnetopause which cause characteristic in situ and ionospheric signatures [Russell and Elphic, 1978, 1979; Elphic et al, 1990]

  • We discuss a further 36 flux transfer events (FTEs) which were observed in March 2007 and March/April 2008; in these months, the Cluster spacecraft crossed the magnetopause within 3 RE of the subsolar point, making the latter group of observations directly comparable with the results reported by Sanny et al [1998]

  • Out of the 213 short‐ listed FTEs, only nine FTEs were observed by at least one spacecraft located in the magnetosheath and at least one situated in the magnetosphere proper. (A further 14 FTEs were observed when the spacecraft straddled the magnetopause, but the magnetospheric spacecraft were located in a boundary layer containing some magnetosheath energy plasma, in which the magnetic field would be expected to be suppressed relative to that in the magnetosphere proper.) In all nine cases the ratio Bsphere/Bsheath, measured outside the FTE, was less than 1.6, and was within the domain in which magnetospheric FTEs would be observed in both the Ding et al [1991] single and multiple X line simulations

Read more

Summary

Asymmetry in the bipolar signatures of flux transfer events

Received 16 February 2010; revised 19 July 2010; accepted 11 August 2010; published 23 November 2010. Two‐dimensional magnetohydrodynamic models have previously been used to simulate both scenarios and have found a tendency for FTEs generated by single X line reconnection to exhibit an asymmetry in the bipolar BN signature that is the major in situ signature of FTE structures, with the leading peak being substantially smaller than the trailing peak. A tendency is found for the BN signatures to be asymmetric but with the leading peak larger in amplitude than the trailing peak, opposite to the prediction made by the 2‐D single X line simulations. This tendency is weaker in the subsolar FTEs. the observations are not consistent with 2‐D MHD simulations of single X line reconnection.

Introduction
Discussion
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call