Abstract

Co-evolutionary theory assumes co-adapted characteristics are a positive response to counter those of another species, whereby co-evolved species reach an evolutionarily stable interaction through bilateral adaptation. However, evidence from the fig-fig wasp mutualistic system implies very different co-evolutionary selection mechanisms, due to the inherent conflict among interacted partners. Fig plants appear to have discriminatively enforced fig wasps to evolve "adaptation characteristics" that provide greater benefit to the fig, and fig wasps appear to have diversified their evolutionary strategies in response to discriminative enforcement by figs and competition among different fig wasp species. In what appears to be an asymmetric interaction, the prosperity of cooperative pollinating wasps should inevitably lead to population increases of parasitic individuals, thus resulting in localized extinctions of pollinating wasps. In response, the sanctioning of parasitic wasps by the fig should lead to a reduction in the parasitic wasp population. The meta-populations created by such asymmetric interactions may result in each population of coevolved species chaotically oscillated, temporally or evolutionarily.

Highlights

  • Co-evolution, which was once previously assumed to be a rare form of evolution, is recognized as a common existence within ecosystems, with either strong or weak interactions between species [1,2]

  • Spatial heterogeneity plays an important role in meta-population creation [47,48]

  • Spatial heterogeneity is created by physical differences, such as climatic or geographic features, and individuals within a species and/or different species might migrate from their habitats to other colonies

Read more

Summary

Biology of fig-fig wasp systems

In the obligate mutualism between figs and their pollinator wasps, the wasps carry pollen from mature syconia (enclosed inflorescences) to receptive syconia, and figs provide pollinators with access to some of their female flowers to oviposit. Adult female wasps that develop in the syconia disperse the fig’s pollen Both pollen dispersion (from mature syconia) and pollen availability (to receptive syconia) are dependent on the species-specific pollinator wasps [21,22]. Figs may inadvertently support cheating individuals of pollinator wasps or non-pollinator wasps that are either parasitoids of fig wasps or resource competitors (i.e., gall makers or inquilines) [26,27]. Gall makers that do not carry pollen to receptive syconia are non-pollinator wasps and cheating individuals of pollinator wasps [14,27]. The species Apocryptophagus testacea and A. mayri are gall makers and compete with pollinator wasps for the common resource, i.e., the female flowers [27,35]. Apocryptophagus agraensis is a parasitoid of pollinator wasps (for more details see [27,36])

Niche separation among fig wasps
Asymmetric species interactions in fig-fig wasp communities
Asymmetric interactions and the metapopulation
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call