Asymmetric Marriage Rules, Status Difference, and Direct Reciprocity: Comments on an Alleged Fallacy

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessAsymmetric Marriage Rules, Status Difference, and Direct Reciprocity: Comments on an Alleged FallacyEdmund LeachEdmund Leach Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 17, Number 4Winter, 1961 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.17.4.3628945 Views: 1Total views on this site Citations: 6Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in the Southwestern Journal of Anthropology (1945-1972), which is continued by the Journal of Anthropological Research (1973-present). PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Rodney Needham ALLIANCE, Oceania 56, no.33 (Feb 2015): 165–180.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1834-4461.1986.tb02130.xPAULINE KOLENDA woman as tribute, woman as flower: images of “woman” in weddings in north and south India, American Ethnologist 11, no.11 (Oct 2009): 98–117.https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1984.11.1.02a00060Kenneth Maddock Alliance and Entailment in Australian Marriage, Mankind 7, no.11 (Feb 2009): 19–26.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-9310.1969.tb00382.xSylvia Vatuk A Structural Analysis of the Hindi Kinship Terminology, Contributions to Indian Sociology 3, no.11 (Jul 2016): 94–115.https://doi.org/10.1177/006996676900300106L. R. Hiatt Authority and Reciprocity in Australian Aboriginal Marriage Arrangements, Mankind 6, no.1010 (May 2010): 468–475.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-9310.1967.tb01350.xRodney Needham Symmetry and Asymmetry in Prescriptive Alliance: Further Comments on an Alleged Fallacy, (Jan 1963): 267–283.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-3658-5_3