Abstract
As(V) adsorption and desorption are studied on forest and vineyard soils and on dump pyritic material, both individually and amended with 24ton/ha (Mg/ha) mussel shell, as well as on mussel shell samples by itself. Adsorption kinetics is also studied, as well as fractionation of the adsorbed As(V). The pyritic material showed the best results, with 100% arsenic adsorption (99.6% adsorbed into the residual fraction), very rapid adsorption kinetics and low desorption percentages (<0.05%). Forest soil adsorbed more than 86% (69% into the acid soluble fraction) and desorbed<5%, while vineyard soil adsorbed>32% and desorbed<36%. As(V) adsorption was between 76% and 53% on mussel shell, while desorption was between 11% and 6%. Amending forest and vineyard soils with 24Mg/ha mussel shell causes increasing arsenic adsorption and decreasing arsenic desorption, with no kinetics effect. Adsorption data were adjusted to the Freundlich model, showing good fitting. In view of that all, this pyritic material could be useful for arsenic removal, while mussel shell amendment could be used to diminish risks of arsenic pollution in vineyard and forest soils.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
