Abstract

A new survey for measuring students’ astronomy and science attitudes that has been validated for use with high school students (with a future intent to expand to middle school and university) is presented. We initially present a short review of instruments in the literature that attempt to measure attitudes in astronomy together with the difficulties encountered in measuring these by researchers in the subsequent analyses of results. To illustrate this, we present an example from an Astro101-level university course to display the problems with the current, most commonly used, astronomy attitude instrument. We then present the initial design and the Factor Analysis of a new instrument designed to address the deficiencies of this existing instrument from a sample of students in a high school-level astronomy education project. The factors identified by this instrument include: Interest in Astronomy, Interest in Science Outside of School, Practical Work in Science, Teacher’s Actions in science, Perceptions of Ability in Science, Future Aspirations in Science, Benefits of Science, and Personal Relevance of School Science, all of which possess high internal response consistency and construct validity.

Highlights

  • T he history of science education reform contains numerous calls for a reassessment of the current approaches due to flagging student interest in science careers and in science in general (e.g., American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) 1990; Millar & Osborne, 1998; Goodrum, Druhan, & Abbs, 2012)

  • We present an example from an Astro101-level university course to display the problems with the current, most commonly used, astronomy attitude instrument

  • We present the initial design and the Factor Analysis of a new instrument designed to address the deficiencies of the previous instrument from a sample of students in a high school-level astronomy education project

Read more

Summary

Introduction

T he history of science education reform contains numerous calls for a reassessment of the current approaches due to flagging student interest in science careers and in science in general (e.g., American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) 1990; Millar & Osborne, 1998; Goodrum, Druhan, & Abbs, 2012). All rely on arguments that there is some *better* approach, in terms of impact on student attitudes and perceptions of science (Danaia, McKinnon, Parker, Fitzgerald, & Stenning, 2012). Students do not think of one monolithic ‘science’. Rather, they think of “physics”, “chemistry” and “biology”. They think of each component of science separately (e.g., Havard, 1996) and “astronomy” is no different. It is very important to measure interest in a generic ‘science’ and a quite specific interest in the scientific field itself, in this case, astronomy

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call