Abstract

Introduction Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) is a newly redefined form of chronic airway disease and has not been well studied among 9/11-exposed populations with increased prevalence of asthma. We assessed the prevalence and risk factors associated with ACO in an exposure cohort of World Trade Center Health Registry (WTCHR) enrollees. Methods This is a longitudinal study, including enrollees with complete data on 9/11/01 exposure at enrollment (2003–2004, Wave 1), asthma and COPD diagnoses and at least 25 years of age at the time of the 2015–2016 (Wave 4) WTCHR survey. Probable ACO was defined as self-reported post-9/11 physician-diagnosed asthma and either emphysema, chronic bronchitis, or COPD. We evaluated whether probable ACO was associated with World Trade Center (WTC)-related exposures, using multivariable logistic regression. Results Of 36,864 Wave 4 participants, 29,911 were eligible for this analysis, and 1,495 (5.0%) had self-reported post-9/11 probable ACO. After adjusting for demographics and smoking status, we found 38% increased odds of having ACO in enrollees with exposure to the dust cloud, and up to 3.39 times the odds in those with ≥3 injuries sustained on 9/11. Among rescue/recovery workers, ever working on the pile, on the pile on 9/11 or 9/12/01, or working on the WTC site for >7 days showed increased odds ratios of having ACO. Conclusion Probable ACO is associated with WTC exposures. Further study of ACO is needed to understand the development of this and other environmentally or occupationally-related airway diseases, and how to prevent these in disasters like 9/11.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.