Associations Between Socioeconomic Status and Patient Experience With Type 1 Diabetes Management and Complications: Cross-sectional Analysis of a Cohort From Québec, Canada

Abstract

BackgroundLow socioeconomic status (SES) may add to the challenges of type 1 diabetes (T1D) management and be an independent risk factor for chronic and acute diabetes complications. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the association between SES and TID management and risk of complications in a universal health-care system using data from a registry of people living with T1D (PWT1D) in Québec, Canada (the BETTER registry). MethodsThis study was a cross-sectional analysis describing the association between SES factors (education, income, employment and insurance coverage) and T1D outcomes (glycated hemoglobin [A1C], acute and chronic complications and comorbidities), using chi-square tests and regression analyses (adjusted for diabetes duration, sex, ethnicity and diabetes technology use). ResultsIn a sample of 1,333 PWT1D, lower education level was associated with cardiovascular disease (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; p=0.002), depression (OR, 1.56; p=0.020), nephropathy (OR, 2.10; p=0.001) and higher A1C (OR, 1.79; p<0.001). Low-income groups were more likely to report higher A1C (OR, 2.16; p=0.001), retinopathy (OR, 1.84; p=0.038), neuropathy (OR, 1.89; p=0.043), nephropathy (OR, 2.23; p=0.024), severe hypoglycemia (OR, 1.87; p=0.022) and depression (OR, 1.87; p=0.012). Unemployment was associated with retinopathy (OR, 2.37; p=0.009) and neuropathy (OR, 1.96; p=0.035). Diabetic ketoacidosis (OR, 2.81; p=0.001) and neuropathy (OR, 1.67; p=0.020) were more likely to be reported by participants with public insurance. ConclusionsPWT1D from lower SES, particularly those with low income and low education, were more likely to report T1D-related complications and comorbidities. Further longitudinal investigations are needed to better understand the nature and directionality of these associations.