Abstract

BackgroundThe emotional impact of medical errors on patients may be long-lasting. Factors associated with prolonged emotional impacts are poorly understood. MethodsWe conducted a subanalysis of a 2017 survey (response rate 37% [2,536/6,891]) of US adults to assess emotional impact of medical error. Patients reporting a medical error were included if the error occurred ≥ 1 year prior. Duration of emotional impact was categorized into no/short-term impact (impact lasting < 1 month), prolonged impact (> 1 month), and especially prolonged impact (> 1 year). Based on their reported experience with communication around the error, we categorized patients experience as consistent with national disclosure guidelines, contrary to guidelines, mixed, or neither. We used multinomial regression to examine associations between patient factors, event characteristics, and organizational communication with prolonged emotional impact (> 1 month, > 1 year). ResultsOf all survey respondents, 18% (451/2,536) reported an error occurring ≥ 1 year prior. Of these, 51% (231/451) reported prolonged/especially prolonged emotional impact (31% prolonged, 20% especially prolonged). Factors associated with prolonged emotion impact included: female gender (adjusted odds ratio 2.1 [95% confidence interval 1.5–2.9]); low socioeconomic status (SES; 1.7 [1.1–2.7]); physical impact (7.3 [4.3–12.3]); no organizational disclosure and no patient/family error reporting (1.5 [1.03–2.3]); communication contrary to guidelines (4.0 [2.1–7.5]); and mixed communication (2.2 [1.3–3.7]). The same factors were significantly associated with especially prolonged emotional impact (female, 1.7 [1.2–2.5]; low SES; 2.2 [1.3–3.6]; physical impact; 6.8 [3.8–12.5]; no disclosure/reporting; 1.9 [1.2–3.2]; communication contrary to guidelines; 4.6 [2.2–9.4]; mixed communication; 2.1 [1.1–3.9]). ConclusionProlonged emotional impact affected more than half of Americans self-reporting a medical error. Organizational failure to communicate according to disclosure guidelines after patient-perceived errors may exacerbate harm, especially for patients at risk of healthcare disparities.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.