Abstract

Food cue exposure can trigger eating. Food cue reactivity (FCR) is a conditioned response to food cues and includes physiological responses and activation of reward-related brain areas. FCR can be affected by hunger and weight status. The appetite-regulating hormones ghrelin and leptin play a pivotal role in homeostatic as well as hedonic eating. We examined the association between ghrelin and leptin levels and neural FCR in the fasted and sated state and the association between meal-induced changes in ghrelin and neural FCR, and in how far these associations are related to BMI and HOMA-IR. Data from 109 participants from three European centers (age 50±18 y, BMI 27±5 kg/m2) who performed a food viewing task during fMRI after an overnight fast and after a standardized meal were analyzed. Blood samples were drawn prior to the viewing task in which high-caloric, low-caloric and non-food images were shown. Fasting ghrelin was positively associated with neural FCR in the inferior and superior occipital gyrus in the fasted state. This was partly attributable to BMI and HOMA-IR. These brain regions are involved in visual attention, suggesting that individuals with higher fasting ghrelin have heightened attention to food cues. Leptin was positively associated with high calorie FCR in the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) in the fasted state and to neural FCR in the left supramarginal gyrus in the fasted versus sated state, when correcting for BMI and HOMA-IR, respectively. This PFC region is involved in assessing anticipated reward value, suggesting that for individuals with higher leptin levels high-caloric foods are more salient than low-caloric foods, but foods in general are not more salient than non-foods. There were no associations between ghrelin and leptin and neural FCR in the sated state, nor between meal-induced changes in ghrelin and neural FCR. In conclusion, we show modest associations between ghrelin and leptin and neural FCR in a relatively large sample of European adults with a broad age and BMI range. Our findings indicate that people with higher leptin levels for their weight status and people with higher ghrelin levels may be more attracted to high caloric foods when hungry. The results of the present study form a foundation for future studies to test whether food intake and (changes in) weight status can be predicted by the association between (mainly fasting) ghrelin and leptin levels and neural FCR.

Highlights

  • In the present study we examined the associations between ghrelin and leptin levels and neural Food cue reactivity (FCR) in the fasted and sated state as well as the association between meal-induced changes in ghrelin and neural FCR, and whether these associations are associated with BMI and HOMA-IR

  • We examined the association between ghrelin and leptin levels and neural FCR in the fasted and sated state as well as the association between meal-induced changes in ghrelin and neural FCR and in how far these associations are related to BMI

  • We found that ghrelin and leptin levels are associated with neural FCR to foods in general and high-caloric foods, respectively, but only in a fasted state

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Appetite-regulating hormones such as ghrelin and leptin play an important role in food intake and their fasting levels differ between individuals with normal weight and individuals with overweight (Caro et al, 1996; Myers et al, 2010; Shiiya et al, 2002; Tschöp et al, 2001). Yang et al (2009) suggest that individuals with overweight might experience lower levels of satiety after a meal, which might promote overconsumption, e.g. by snacking in between meals This idea is supported by the finding that individuals with overweight consume more in an ad libitum buffet meal than individuals with normal weight after a low ghrelin dose, while intake is similar after a high ghrelin dose (Druce et al, 2005). This so-called leptin resistance might be a consequence of overconsumption and perpetuate an elevated defense of adiposity levels (Caro et al, 1996; Kolaczynski et al, 1996; Myers et al, 2010; Sahu, 2002)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call