Abstract

BackgroundBeing the product of the same environment, soil and vegetation are mutually associated with each other, but the relationships between edaphic properties and vegetation characteristics are still far from clear. Accordingly, the specific aim of this study is to identify relationships between forest site types/forest types and the fertility of soil organic horizons in northwestern Russia. The relationships were assessed at the level of three large forest regions, the northern and middle taiga of the Republic of Karelia, and the Karelian Isthmus (Leningrad region), based on 37 spruce, 66 pine, and 16 birch plots which were integrated with the International Cooperative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests (ICP Forests).ResultsSoil forming rock and land-use history partly explain the differences in the fertility of soil organic horizons between the forest ecosystems in northwestern Russia. Climatic factors are closely correlated with plant species richness, density and the fertility of soil organic horizons. Nutrient content in the organic horizons increased from poor to rich site types identified according to composition of understory vegetation and the occurrence of certain indicator species, i.e. Cajander’s forest site types. The most informative parameters in explaining differences between Cajander’s types were nitrogen, carbon to nitrogen ratio, exchangeable calcium, magnesium, potassium, and base saturation. Extractable phosphorus, carbon to nitrogen ratio, exchangeable calcium, magnesium, aluminum and base saturation were the most informative parameters in explaining differences between forest types identified within the Cajander types in accordance with the tree species composition, i.e. Sukachev’s forest types. The organic horizons of spruce and birch-dominated forests contained significantly more nutrients, compared to those dominated by pine. These differences were explained by differences in litter quality, and the crown shape and density of tree species, which affect the intensity of nutrient leaching.ConclusionsThe study presents new findings regarding the relationships between forest sites/types and the fertility of soil organic horizons in northwestern Russia. Differences in organic horizon’s fertility between the taiga subzones are explained by differences in the soil forming rock, climatic conditions, land-use history and shares of forest site types/forest types.

Highlights

  • Being the product of the same environment, soil and vegetation are mutually associated with each other, but the relationships between edaphic properties and vegetation characteristics are still far from clear

  • The influence of other important soil-forming factors was identified at the regional level, such as soil forming rock, the effect of the land use history and different climatic conditions

  • The different results for Ca are explained by the specific land-use history in the Karelian Isthmus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Being the product of the same environment, soil and vegetation are mutually associated with each other, but the relationships between edaphic properties and vegetation characteristics are still far from clear. Non-vascular cryptogams, such as bryophytes and lichens which are widely distributed in boreal forests, are important hosts for nitrogen-fixing bacteria. They act as a major nitrogen supply in soils and significantly contribute to aboveground biomass; they control soil chemistry and nutrition through the accumulation of recalcitrant polyphenols (Cornelissen et al 2007). New findings emerged during the 1990’s regarding the impact of different trees species on the properties of forest soils (Binkley et al 1992; Berkvist and Folkeson 1995). Augusto (2002) ranked the following tree species by their ability to reduce soil acidity: (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst., Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carrière, Pinus sylvestris L.) > (Abies alba Mill., Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) > (Betula pendula Roth, Fagus sylvatica L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl., Quercus robur L.) > (Acer platanoides L., Carpinus betulus L., Fraxinus excelsior L., Tilia cordata Mill.)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call