Abstract

Association rule mining based on support and confidence generates a large number of rules. However, post analysis is required to obtain interesting rules as many of the generated rules are useless. We pose mining association rules as multi-objective optimization problem where objective functions are rule interestingness measures and use NSGA-II, a well known multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA), to solve the problem. We compare our results vis-à-vis results obtained by a traditional rule mining algorithm - Apriori and contrary to the other works reported in the literature clearly highlight the quality of obtained rules and challenges while using MOEAs for mining association rules. Though none of the algorithm emerged as clear winner, some of the rules obtained by MOEA could not be obtained by traditional data mining algorithm. We treat the whole process from data mining perspective and discuss the pitfalls responsible for relatively poor performance of the MOEA which has been shown as a good performer in other paradigms.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.