Association of treatment regimens with quality of life and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Peru.

Abstract

e15617 Background: Colorectal cancer is a significant public health concern in Peru. Metastatic colorectal cancer patients have limited treatment options, and the prognosis is generally poor. In recent years, treatment regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer have evolved significantly, with the emergence of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. However, little is known about the impact of these treatment regimens on quality of life and overall survival in the Peruvian population. The objective of this study is to investigate the association between treatment regimens and quality of life and overall survival (OS) in Peruvian metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Methods: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer between 2010 and 2020 at the AUNA clinic. Patients were included if they received chemotherapy as first-line treatment and were followed up for at least 6 months. Quality of life was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) questionnaire, which includes subscales for physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being, as well as colorectal cancer-specific concerns. Treatment regimens considered were: FOLFOX, FOLFIRI and others. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with quality of life and overall survival. Results: A total of 193 patients were included in the study, and the median follow-up time was 14 months. The majority of patients were male (60.6%) and the median age was 57 years. The most common first-line chemotherapy regimens were FOLFOX (52.7%), FOLFIRI (23.5%), and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (16.4%). The median overall survival was 14 months, and the 1-year overall survival rate was 52.8%. Patients treated with FOLFOX had significantly better quality of life scores than those treated with FOLFIRI or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (p = 0.012). The difference in quality of life scores was most pronounced in the emotional and social/family well-being subscales. However, there was no significant difference in overall survival among the different treatment regimens (p = 0.344). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of liver metastases and higher FACT-C scores were independent predictors of OS. Conclusions: Our study has shown that the choice of treatment regimen in Peruvian metastatic colorectal cancer patients can have a significant impact on their quality of life. Patients treated with FOLFOX as first line had better quality of life scores than those treated with FOLFIRI or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin, particularly in emotional and social/family well-being subscales. However, there was no significant difference in OS among the different treatment regimens. The presence of liver metastases and higher quality of life scores were found to be independent predictors of overall survival.