Association of tibia lead and blood lead with end-stage renal disease: A pilot study of African–Americans

Abstract

The association between body lead burden and kidney disease remains controversial. Fifty-five African–American end-stage renal disease (ESRD) cases and 53 age- and sex-matched African–American controls without known renal disease were recruited from Tulane University-affiliated dialysis clinics and out-patient clinics, respectively. Blood lead was measured via atomic absorption spectrophotometry and tibia lead (a measure of body lead) was measured via 109Cd-based K shell X-ray fluorescence. Median blood lead levels were significantly higher among ESRD cases (6 μg/dL) compared to their control counterparts (3 μg/dL; P<0.001). Although no participants had overt lead poisoning (blood lead ⩾25 μg/dL), seven cases but no controls had blood lead levels above 10 μg/dL ( P=0.006). The median tibia lead level was 17 micrograms of lead per gram of bone mineral (μg/g) and 13 μg/g among ESRD cases and their control counterparts, respectively ( P=0.134). Four ESRD cases (7%), but no controls, had a tibia lead level above 40 μg/g ( P=0.115) while a similar proportion of cases and controls had tibia lead between 20 and 39 μg/g (33% and 32%, respectively; P=0.726). After adjustment for potential confounders, the odds ratios of ESRD associated with a tibia lead ⩾20 μg/g and each four-fold higher tibia lead (e.g., 5–20 μg/g) were 1.55 (95% CI: 0.55, 4.41) and 1.88 (95% CI: 0.53, 6.68), respectively. These findings support the need for prospective cohort studies of body lead burden and renal disease progression.