Abstract

Objective To assess the association between the expression level of miR-16 and prognosis of solid cancer patients by meta-analysis and bioinformatic analysis. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched until October 31, 2019, to identify eligible studies reporting the association of the miR-16 status with the prognosis of solid cancer patients. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled, and a heterogeneity test was conducted. Sensitivity analysis and a publication bias test were also carried out. Furthermore, the miRpower database was used to validate the association. Results Thirteen articles with 2303 solid cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis. Solid cancer patients with low expression level of miR-16 had shorter survival time (I2 = 84.0%, HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.13-1.91, P = 0.004). In the subgroup analyses of cancer sites, low miR-16 expression level was associated with poor prognosis in the reproductive system cancers (I2 = 33.3%, HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.45, P = 0.008). Sensitivity analysis suggested that the pooled HR was stable and omitting a single study did not change the significance of the pooled HR. Begg's test and Egger's test revealed no publication bias in the meta-analysis. In bioinformatic analysis, the significant association between miR-16 level and prognosis of patients with reproductive system cancers was further confirmed (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03-1.42, P = 0.017). Conclusion Low expression level of miR-16 is an indicator for poor prognosis of solid cancer patients, particularly in reproductive system cancers.

Highlights

  • MicroRNAs, a family of 21-25-nucleotide small noncoding RNAs, participate in a variety of pathophysiological processes, such as cell migration, invasion, proliferation, and differentiation [1]

  • The studies which met the following explicit criteria were included: (1) the study design was a prospective study, (2) the study population were patients who have been diagnosed with certain cancers by medical institutions, (3) miR-16 expression levels were classified as two categories, (4) hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) can be extracted directly or indirectly by calculation, (5) types of cancer are limited to solid cancer, and (6) language is limited to English

  • In the stratified analyses of cancer sites, low miR-16 expression level was associated with poor prognosis in the reproductive system cancers (I2 = 33:3%, HR = 1:24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.45, P = 0:008) and other system cancers (I2 = 63:5%, HR = 2:07, 95% CI: 1.38-3.10, P ≤ 0:001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs), a family of 21-25-nucleotide small noncoding RNAs, participate in a variety of pathophysiological processes, such as cell migration, invasion, proliferation, and differentiation [1]. They regulate gene expression and function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors posttranscriptionally by degrading target miRNAs or blocking their translation [2]. Dysregulated expression of miRNAs could result in solid cancer progression and might serve as an independent predictor for solid patient outcomes [8]. MiR125b was an independent prognostic marker for lung cancer [9], and miR-221 was a predictor of prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [10]. A systematic review and meta-analysis came to the conclusion that miR-16 family

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.