Abstract
Millions of Americans gained insurance through the state expansion of Medicaid, but several states with large populations of racial/ethnic minorities did not expand their programs. To investigate the implications of Medicaid expansion for liver transplant (LT) wait-listing trends for racial/ethnic minorities. A cohort study was performed of adults wait-listed for LT using the United Network of Organ Sharing database between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017. Poisson regression and a controlled, interrupted time series analysis were used to model trends in wait-listing rates by race/ethnicity. The setting was LT centers in the United States. (1) Wait-listing rates by race/ethnicity in states that expanded Medicaid (expansion states) compared with those that did not (nonexpansion states) and (2) actual vs predicted rates of LT wait-listing by race/ethnicity after Medicaid expansion. There were 75 748 patients (median age, 57.0 [interquartile range, 50.0-62.0] years; 48 566 [64.1%] male) wait-listed for LT during the study period. The cohort was 8.9% Black and 16.4% Hispanic. Black patients and Hispanic patients were statistically significantly more likely to be wait-listed in expansion states than in nonexpansion states (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.54 [95% CI, 1.44-1.64] for Black patients and 1.21 [95% CI, 1.15-1.28] for Hispanic patients). After Medicaid expansion, there was a decrease in the wait-listing rate of Black patients in expansion states (annual percentage change [APC], -4.4%; 95% CI, -8.2% to -0.6%) but not in nonexpansion states (APC, 0.5%; 95% CI, -4.0% to 5.2%). This decrease was not seen when Black patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) were excluded from the analysis (APC, 3.1%; 95% CI, -2.4% to 8.9%), suggesting that they may be responsible for this expansion state trend. Hispanic Medicaid patients without HCV were statistically significantly more likely to be wait-listed in the post-Medicaid expansion era than would have been predicted without Medicaid expansion (APC, 13.2%; 95% CI, 4.0%-23.2%). This cohort study found that LT wait-listing rates have decreased for Black patients with HCV in states that expanded Medicaid. Conversely, wait-listing rates have increased for Hispanic patients without HCV. Black patients and Hispanic patients may have benefited differently from Medicaid expansion.
Highlights
Liver transplant (LT) is the standard-of-care and life-saving treatment for end-stage liver disease (ESLD)
Black patients and Hispanic patients were statistically significantly more likely to be wait-listed in expansion states than in nonexpansion states
After Medicaid expansion, there was a decrease in the wait-listing rate of Black patients in expansion states but not in nonexpansion states (APC, 0.5%; 95% CI, −4.0% to 5.2%)
Summary
Liver transplant (LT) is the standard-of-care and life-saving treatment for end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Comprehensive national data do not exist on the exact burden of ESLD, data suggest racial/ethnic disparities in access to LT wait-listing.[1,2] This finding is not entirely unexpected because disparities earlier in the care continuum have been described in access to hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy, treatment for cirrhosis complications, and referral for LT.[3,4,5] Once racial/ethnic minority patients are wait-listed for LT, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease era data suggest that transplant rates are similar to those of White candidates.[6] a critical step in achieving equitable care of patients with ESLD is ensuring access to LT wait-listing. More than one-quarter of transplant ethics consultations describe restrictions in transplant-related treatment for financial or insurance reasons.[8]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.