Association of Self-Administered Nitrous Oxide for Labor Analgesia With Maternal and Neonatal Process and Outcome Measures

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

ObjectiveTo describe patterns of use of self-administered nitrous oxide (N2O) during labor and to determine if maternal and neonatal process and outcome measures differ for women who use N2O compared to women who do not use N2O. DesignRetrospective, full-census, observational cohort. SettingAn upper midwestern U.S., urban, 75-bed quaternary perinatal center with more than 5,000 annual births. ParticipantsThe participants included two groups of women: 400 who used N2O during labor and a comparison group of 6,733 who met N2O eligibility but did not use N2O. MethodsWe used descriptive statistics to examine patterns of use of N2O during labor between January 2015 and March 2017. We examined associations of N2O with process (length of first and second stages of labor, time from hospital admission to birth, time from birth to hospital discharge, and total length of stay) and outcome measures (shoulder dystocia, instrumentation, vaginal lacerations, Apgar scores at 5 minutes, nursery disposition) using multivariate linear, logistic, and ordinal regression models. ResultsThree percent (12/400) of women who used N2O discontinued because of side effects. Among participants with vaginal births who used N2O, 17.6% (62/352) used N2O as the only form of pain medication during labor. We found no significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcome measures between the two groups. Among the process measures examined, we found a mean 2-hour-longer time from admission to birth and total length of stay in the N2O group (p < .05) compared to the non-N2O group. ConclusionMost participants who used N2O (290/352, 82.3%) transitioned to other pain modalities during labor. Maternal and neonatal process and outcome measures were comparable relative to other pain management modalities, with the exception of longer time durations for two measures.