Abstract

The persistence of inequities that disadvantage women physicians remains empirically underexplained. Understanding the cultural factors that are associated with disparities in harassment, discrimination, remuneration, and career trajectory are critical to addressing inequities. To explore how physicians perceive the climate for women physicians and compare perceptions and experiences of gender inequity among physicians based on characteristics including gender, faculty status, parental status, and years in practice. This sequential, explanatory, mixed-methods qualitative study used the Culture Conducive to Women's Academic Success (CCWAS; range 45-225, with higher scores indicating better perceived culture toward women), followed by individual semistructured interviews with physicians at the Department of Medicine of the University of Calgary. All 389 physician members of the Department of Medicine, including academic and clinical physicians and those of any gender, were invited to participate in the survey and interview phases. The culture within the department for women physicians was assessed using the CCWAS score. Scores were compared between respondents' gender and years in practice. Interviews with physicians were used to further explore findings from the CCWAS and to understand experiences and perceptions of gender disparities. A total of 169 of 389 physicians completed the survey (response rate, 43.4%; 102 [59.9%] women; 65 [38.9%] men; and 2 [1.2%] who did not disclose gender); 28 participants (7.2%) elected to participate in an interview (22 [78.6%] women; 6 [21.4%] men). Women physicians perceived the culture of the department toward women as significantly worse than men physicians (median [interquartile range] CCWAS score, 137.0 [118.0-155.0] vs 164.5 [154.0-183.4]; P < .001). Physicians with more than 15 years in practice perceived the culture toward women as significantly more favorable than physicians with 15 years or less in practice (median [interquartile range] CCWAS score, 157.0 [138.8-181.3] vs 147.0 [127.5-164.3]; P = .02). Qualitative data demonstrated that experiences of junior women (ie, physicians who graduated medical school after 1996, when an equal number of men and women in medical school was achieved in Canada) and perceptions of senior men (ie, those who graduated before 1996) were most different; junior women reported high rates of discrimination and harassment, while senior men perceived that the Department of Medicine had achieved gender equity. In this study, senior men physicians' perceptions of gender equity were different from lived experiences of gender inequity reported by junior women physicians. This demographic mismatch between perceptions and experiences of gender equity in medicine may explain the lack of action by leaders and decision-makers in medicine to mitigate disparities.

Highlights

  • Women physicians perceived the culture of the department toward women as significantly worse than men physicians

  • Physicians with more than 15 years in practice perceived the culture toward women as significantly more favorable than physicians with 15 years or less in practice

  • Qualitative data demonstrated that experiences of junior women and perceptions of senior men were most different; junior women reported high rates of discrimination and harassment, while senior men perceived that the Department of Medicine had achieved gender equity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Gender disparities that disadvantage women physicians in compensation, leadership attainment, and experiences of discrimination are well described.[1,2,3,4,5] Compelling evidence of a gender gap in remuneration, academic promotion, and harassment has existed since at least 1990.6-8 Despite 23 years of numerical equality between women and men in medical school, contemporary Canadian data demonstrate gender disparities in pay, leadership, and harassment for women physicians and academics.[9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] These data suggest that additional factors, beyond the number of female physicians available to enter leadership tracks and the awareness of the gender gap, contribute to ongoing inequities.Several explanations have been proposed for persistent disparities, including systemic harassment and discrimination against women physicians, misalignment of women physician’s personal values with the objectives of leadership, and work-home conflict.[13,20,21] Previous literature has demonstrated that discrimination against women is linked to perceptions of a culture that is permissive of bias and harassment.[20,22,23]Academic environments remain problematic for women.[23,24,25] Deficits theory has been used to explain inhospitable workplaces, arguing that deficits in the scientific setting may explain differences in career experiences and outcomes because of structural mechanisms that limit opportunities for women. Gender disparities that disadvantage women physicians in compensation, leadership attainment, and experiences of discrimination are well described.[1,2,3,4,5] Compelling evidence of a gender gap in remuneration, academic promotion, and harassment has existed since at least 1990.6-8 Despite 23 years of numerical equality between women and men in medical school, contemporary Canadian data demonstrate gender disparities in pay, leadership, and harassment for women physicians and academics.[9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19] These data suggest that additional factors, beyond the number of female physicians available to enter leadership tracks and the awareness of the gender gap, contribute to ongoing inequities. Many organizations, such as academic centers or hospitals, may believe they provide positive, nonsexist climates; employees may not share these perceptions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.