Association of Parental Status and Gender with Burden of Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards

Abstract

Tumor boards are an integral part of the management of patients with cancer. However, there is limited data investigating the burden of tumor boards on physicians. Our objective was to determine what physician-related, and tumor board-related factors associate with higher burden. Tumor board start times were collected by email from 22 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers and/or U.S. World and News Report Top 40 hospitals for cancer. Tumor board burden was assessed by a cross-sectional convenience survey posted on social media and by email to Cedars-Sinai Medical Center cancer physicians between March 3, 2022, and April 3, 2022. Tumor board burden was measured on a 4-point scale (1, not at all; 2, slightly; 3, moderately; 4, very burdensome). Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed using a probabilistic index model. The timing of 392 tumor boards was collected from 22 institutions. The most common tumor board start time was at or before 0730 (24.6%). Surveys were completed by 111 physicians, of which 52.3% identified as women and 42.3% as men. Reported specialties were radiation oncology (39.6%), medical oncology (18.0%), surgery (15.3%), radiology (12.6%), and pathology (9.9%). On average, 41.4% attended ≥3 hours/week total of tumor boards and 1-2 hours/week of early/late tumor boards (defined as starting before 0800 or 1700 or after). Overall, 37.8% reported tumor boards were at least moderately burdensome. On multivariable analysis, radiology/pathology specialty (probability 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.79; p = 0.015), attending ≥3 hours/week of tumor boards (probability 0.68; 95% CI, 0.58-0.76; p<.001), and having ≥2 children (probability 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.77; p = 0.029), were associated with higher burden. Early/late tumor boards were frequently considered burdensome (20.7% moderately, 29.7% very burdensome). On multivariable analysis, identifying as a woman (probability 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.78; p = 0.003) and having children (probability 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.84; p<.001) remained associated with a higher level of burden from early/late tumor boards. Further, parents frequently reported that early/late tumor boards negatively affected childcare (55.8%), feeding and/or sleep logistics (33.8%), and overall family dynamics (63.7%). Identifying as a woman and having children were associated with a higher level of burden from early/late tumor boards. The negative impact of early/late tumor boards on overall family dynamics, including children feeding, sleeping, and childcare logistics, was commonly reported by parents. Having ≥2 children, attending ≥3 hours/week of tumor boards, and radiology/pathology specialty were associated with a higher level of burden overall. Future strategies should aim to decrease burden, particularly the disparate impact on parents and women.