Abstract

There are marked racial/ethnic differences in hip and knee joint replacement care as well as concerns that value-based payments may exacerbate existing racial/ethnic disparities in care. To examine changes in joint replacement care associated with Medicare's Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model among White, Black, and Hispanic patients. Retrospective cohort study of Medicare claims from 2013 through 2017 among White, Black, and Hispanic patients undergoing joint replacement in 67 treatment (selected for CJR participation) and 103 control metropolitan statistical areas. The CJR model holds hospitals accountable for spending and quality of joint replacement care during care episodes (index hospitalization through 90 days after discharge). The primary outcomes were spending, discharge to institutional postacute care, and readmission during care episodes. Among 688 346 patients, 442 163 (64.2%) were women, and 87 286 (12.7%) were 85 years or older. Under CJR, spending decreased by $439 for White patients (95% CI, -$718 to -$161; from pre-CJR spending in treatment metropolitan statistical areas of $25 264) but did not change for Black patients and Hispanic patients. Discharges to institutional postacute care decreased for all groups (-2.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.7 to -0.4, from pre-CJR risk of 46.2% for White patients; -6.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -9.8 to -2.2, from pre-CJR risk of 59.5% for Black patients; and -4.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.6 to -1.0, from pre-CJR risk of 54.3% for Hispanic patients). Readmission risk decreased for Black patients by 3.1 percentage points (95% CI, -5.9 to -0.4, from pre-CJR risk of 21.8%) and did not change for White patients and Hispanic patients. Under CJR, Black-White differences in discharges to institutional postacute care decreased by 3.4 percentage points (95% CI, -6.4 to -0.5, from the pre-CJR Black-White difference of 13.3 percentage points). No evidence was found demonstrating that Black-White differences changed for other outcomes or that Hispanic-White differences changed for any outcomes under CJR. In this cohort study of patients receiving joint replacements, CJR was associated with decreased readmissions for Black patients. Furthermore, Black patients experienced a greater decrease in discharges to institutional postacute care relative to White patients, representing relative improvements despite concerns that value-based payment models may exacerbate existing disparities. Nonetheless, differences between White and Black patients in joint replacement care still persisted even after these changes.

Highlights

  • Hip and knee replacements improve function and quality of life for people with severe osteoarthritis, a leading cause of disability among older adults

  • Discharges to institutional postacute care decreased for all groups (−2.5 percentage points; 95% CI, −4.7 to −0.4, from pre-Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) risk of 46.2% for White patients; −6.0 percentage points; 95% CI, −9.8 to −2.2, from pre-CJR risk of 59.5% for Black patients; and −4.3 percentage points; 95% CI, −7.6 to −1.0, from pre-CJR risk of 54.3% for Hispanic patients)

  • Readmission risk decreased for Black patients by 3.1 percentage points and did not change for White patients and Hispanic patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hip and knee replacements improve function and quality of life for people with severe osteoarthritis, a leading cause of disability among older adults. Hip and knee (“joint” hereafter) replacements are the most common inpatient procedures for Medicare beneficiaries and account for more than 10% of Medicare spending.[1,2] there are marked racial/ethnic differences in surgical outcomes and postsurgical health service use among patients undergoing joint replacement. Evidence about Hispanic-White differences in joint replacement care is mixed, with some studies reporting similar or lower risk of complications for Hispanic patients than for White patients, while others report higher risk of infections and other complications.[7,15,16,17,18,19]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.