Abstract
Background: A considerable proportion of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) are dead or severely disabled at 3 months despite successful reperfusion. Ischemic core imaging biomarkers may help to identify patients who are more likely to have a poor outcome after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) despite successful reperfusion. We studied the association of CT perfusion-(CTP), CT angiography-(CTA), and non-contrast CT-(NCCT) based imaging markers with poor outcome in patients who underwent EVT in daily clinical practice.Methods: We included EVT-treated patients (July 2016–November 2017) with an anterior circulation occlusion from the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry with available baseline CTP, CTA, and NCCT. We used multivariable binary and ordinal logistic regression to analyze the association of CTP ischemic core volume, CTA-Collateral Score (CTA-CS), and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) with poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) 5-6) and likelihood of having a lower score on the mRS at 90 days.Results: In 201 patients, median core volume was 13 (IQR 5-41) mL. Median ASPECTS was 9 (IQR 8-10). Most patients had grade 2 (83/201; 42%) or grade 3 (28/201; 14%) collaterals. CTP ischemic core volume was associated with poor outcome [aOR per 10 mL 1.02 (95%CI 1.01–1.04)] and lower likelihood of having a lower score on the mRS at 90 days [aOR per 10 mL 0.85 (95% CI 0.78–0.93)]. In multivariable analysis, neither CTA-CS nor ASPECTS were significantly associated with poor outcome or the likelihood of having a lower mRS.Conclusion: In our population of patients treated with EVT in daily clinical practice, CTP ischemic core volume is associated with poor outcome and lower likelihood of shift toward better outcome in contrast to either CTA-CS or ASPECTS.
Highlights
The efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is wellestablished for eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) in both the early (0–6 h) and late (6–24 h) time window (1–7)
We investigated if the association of successful reperfusion with a shift toward better outcome was modified by computed tomography perfusion (CTP) ischemic core volume, computed tomography angiography (CTA)-CS, and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) by adding interaction terms (CTP ischemic core volume∗successful reperfusion; Computed Tomography Angiography Collateral Score (CTA-CS)∗successful reperfusion; ASPECTS∗successful reperfusion) to the multivariable ordinal regression models
The distribution of occlusion location, CTA-CS, and ASPECTS was comparable to the overall MR CLEAN Registry cohort (Table 1)
Summary
The efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is wellestablished for eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) in both the early (0–6 h) and late (6–24 h) time window (1–7). Most of the early time window trials used non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) to select patients, whereas the late time window trials used computed tomography perfusion (CTP) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to select patients based on ischemic core volumes. The most commonly used imaging parameters to evaluate patients for EVT are the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) on NCCT, occlusion location and collateral score on CTA (CTA-CS), and the estimated ischemic core volume on CTP. The AHA/ASA and ESO/ESMINT guidelines currently do not recommend CTP for patient selection for EVT in the early time window (9, 10). We studied the association of CT perfusion-(CTP), CT angiography-(CTA), and non-contrast CT-(NCCT) based imaging markers with poor outcome in patients who underwent EVT in daily clinical practice
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.