Abstract

Given that 40% of hand function is achieved with the thumb, replantation of traumatic thumb injuries is associated with substantial quality-of-life benefits. However, fewer replantations are being performed annually in the US, which has been associated with less surgical expertise and increased risk of future replantation failures. Thus, understanding how interfacility transfers and hospital characteristics are associated with outcomes warrants further investigation. To assess the association of interfacility transfer, patient characteristics, and hospital factors with thumb replantation attempts and success. This cross-sectional study used data from the US National Trauma Data Bank from 2009 to 2016 for adult patients with isolated traumatic thumb amputation injury who underwent revision amputation or replantation. Data analysis was performed from May 4, 2020, to July 20, 2020. Interfacility transfer, defined as transfer of a patient from 1 hospital to another to obtain care for traumatic thumb amputation. Replantation attempt and replantation success, defined as having undergone a replantation without a subsequent revision amputation during the same hospitalization. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to assess the associations of interfacility transfer, patient characteristics, and hospital factors with replantation outcomes. Of 3670 patients included in this analysis, 3307 (90.1%) were male and 2713 (73.9%) were White; the mean (SD) age was 45.8 (16.5) years. A total of 1881 patients (51.2%) were transferred to another hospital; most of these patients were male (1720 [91.4%]) and White (1420 [75.5%]). After controlling for patient and hospital characteristics, uninsured patients were less likely to have thumb replantation attempted (odds ratio [OR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.78) or a successful replantation (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49-0.84). Interfacility transfer was associated with increased odds of replantation attempt (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.13-1.59), with 13% of the variation at the hospital level. Interfacility transfer was also associated with increased replantation success (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.47), with 14% of variation at the hospital level. In this cross-sectional study, interfacility transfer and particularly hospital-level variation were associated with increased thumb replantation attempts and successes. These findings suggest a need for creating policies that incentivize hospitals with replantation expertise to provide treatment for traumatic thumb amputations, including promotion of centralization of replantation care.

Highlights

  • Hand injuries account for 12% of all traumatic injuries in the US, many of which consist of traumatic digit amputations.[1]

  • Interfacility transfer was associated with increased odds of replantation attempt (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.13-1.59), with 13% of the variation at the hospital level

  • Interfacility transfer was associated with increased replantation success (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.47), with 14% of variation at the hospital level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hand injuries account for 12% of all traumatic injuries in the US, many of which consist of traumatic digit amputations.[1] Traumatic thumb amputations are associated with social concerns for the patient, functional decline, and considerable economic consequences for the community attributed to patient absenteeism and loss of employment.[2,3] Recent evidence suggests that digit replantation may be associated with substantial benefit compared with revision amputation owing to improved function and appearance of the hand.[4,5,6] In a recent study, patients with thumb amputations who underwent replantation reported better outcomes compared with patients who underwent revision amputation; thumb amputation has been considered an absolute indication for replantation.[5] Despite the added benefits associated with replantation, there has been a decreasing trend in the rates of replantation attempts and subsequent success.[7,8,9] In the US, replantation success rates have decreased from approximately 75% in the early 2000s to approximately 66% from 2010 to 2012.8 In contrast, in countries such as China and Japan replantation success rates are approximately 90%.10

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call