Abstract
Risk of mortality and major comorbidity remains high following hepatic resection. Given recent advancements in nonsurgical techniques to control hepatic malignancy, accurate assessment of surgical candidates, especially those considered frail, has become imperative. The present study aimed to characterize the impact of frailty on clinical and financial outcomes following hepatic resection in older individuals. Retrospective cohort study. All older adults (≥65years) undergoing elective hepatic resection were identified from the 2012 to 2019 National Inpatient Sample. Frailty was defined by using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty-defining diagnosis indicator. Multivariable regression models were developed to assess the independent association of frailty with mortality, perioperative complications, and resource utilization. Marginal effects were tabulated to assess the impact of hospital volume on frailty-associated mortality. Of an estimated 40,735 patients undergoing major hepatic resection, 9.0% were considered frail. After multivariable adjustment, frailty was associated with increased odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-4.3; P < .001) and perioperative complication (AOR 2.9; 95% CI 2.4-3.4; P < .001). Furthermore, frail patients incurred longer risk-adjusted length of stay (14.2 vs 6.7days, P < .001) and greater hospitalization costs ($55,100 vs $29,300, P < .001). In assessing the impact of institutional expertise on perioperative outcomes, the marginal effect of frailty on mortality became less pronounced with increasing operative volume. As the population of the United States continues to age, surgeons are increasingly likely to encounter candidates for major hepatic resection who are frail. The present study associated frailty with inferior clinical and financial outcomes; however, frailty-associated mortality became less pronounced at centers with high hepatic resection operative volume. Coding-based instruments, such as the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups, may identify patients from electronic medical records who may benefit from further geriatric assessment and targeted treatments.
Highlights
ObjectivesRisk of mortality and major comorbidity remains high following hepatic resection. Given recent advancements in nonsurgical techniques to control hepatic malignancy, accurate assessment of surgical candidates, especially those considered frail, has become imperative
We performed a cross-sectional study of all older adult patients undergoing elective hepatic resection in the 2012e2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS).[20]
Compared with their nonfrail counterparts, individuals classified as frail by the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups were at increased odds of mortality and perioperative complication
Summary
Risk of mortality and major comorbidity remains high following hepatic resection. Given recent advancements in nonsurgical techniques to control hepatic malignancy, accurate assessment of surgical candidates, especially those considered frail, has become imperative. The present study aimed to characterize the impact of frailty on clinical and financial outcomes following hepatic resection in older individuals. Marginal effects were tabulated to assess the impact of hospital volume on frailty-associated mortality. Results: Of an estimated 40,735 patients undergoing major hepatic resection, 9.0% were considered frail. In assessing the impact of institutional expertise on perioperative outcomes, the marginal effect of frailty on mortality became less pronounced with increasing operative volume. The present study associated frailty with inferior clinical and financial outcomes; frailty-associated mortality became less pronounced at centers with high hepatic resection operative volume. Coding-based instruments, such as the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups, may identify patients from electronic medical records who may benefit from further geriatric assessment and targeted treatments
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
