Abstract

BackgroundWe have previously shown that fidaxomicin instillation prevents spore recovery in an in-vitro gut model, whereas vancomycin does not. The reasons for this are unclear. Here, we have investigated persistence of fidaxomicin and vancomycin on C. difficile spores, and examined post-antibiotic exposure spore recovery, outgrowth and toxin production.MethodsPrevalent UK C. difficile ribotypes (n = 10) were incubated with 200mg/L fidaxomicin, vancomycin or a non-antimicrobial containing control for 1 h in faecal filtrate or Phosphate Buffered Saline. Spores were washed three times with faecal filtrate or phosphate buffered saline, and residual spore-associated antimicrobial activity was determined by bioassay. For three ribotypes (027, 078, 015), antimicrobial-exposed, faecal filtrate-washed spores and controls were inoculated into broth. Viable vegetative and spore counts were enumerated on CCEYL agar. Percentage phase bright spores, phase dark spores and vegetative cells were enumerated by phase contrast microscopy at 0, 3, 6, 24 and 48 h post-inoculation. Toxin levels (24 and 48h) were determined by cell cytotoxicity assay.ResultsFidaxomicin, but not vancomycin persisted on spores of all ribotypes following washing in saline (mean = 10.1mg/L; range = 4.0-14mg/L) and faecal filtrate (mean = 17.4mg/L; 8.4–22.1mg/L). Outgrowth and proliferation rates of vancomycin-exposed spores were similar to controls, whereas fidaxomicin-exposed spores showed no vegetative cell growth after 24 and 48 h. At 48h, toxin levels averaged 3.7 and 3.3 relative units (RU) in control and vancomycin-exposed samples, respectively, but were undetectable in fidaxomicin-exposed samples.ConclusionFidaxomicin persists on C. difficile spores, whereas vancomycin does not. This persistence prevents subsequent growth and toxin production in vitro. This may have implications on spore viability, thereby impacting CDI recurrence and transmission rates.

Highlights

  • Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) continues to be a leading infective cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, placing substantial burdens on healthcare systems worldwide.[1, 2] Morbidity and mortality, associated with recurrent disease, remain problematic, with ~25% of patients experiencing a recurrence of symptoms following treatment.[3, 4] A key contributing factor to the high rates of recurrence associated with CDI is the persistence of C. difficile spores in the intestinal lumen following treatment.[5]

  • Fidaxomicin, but not vancomycin persisted on spores of all ribotypes following washing in saline and faecal filtrate

  • Fidaxomicin persists on C. difficile spores, whereas vancomycin does not

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) continues to be a leading infective cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, placing substantial burdens on healthcare systems worldwide.[1, 2] Morbidity and mortality, associated with recurrent disease, remain problematic, with ~25% of patients experiencing a recurrence of symptoms following treatment.[3, 4] A key contributing factor to the high rates of recurrence associated with CDI is the persistence of C. difficile spores in the intestinal lumen (or mucosal associated biofilm) following treatment.[5]. Treatment options were limited to vancomycin and metronidazole. The recent introduction of fidaxomicin offers a therapeutic alternative. In phase III clinical trials fidaxomicin was non inferior to vancomycin for initial clinical cure, but was superior in preventing recurrence and sustained clinical sure.[8,9,10]. We have previously shown that fidaxomicin instillation prevents spore recovery in an in-vitro gut model, whereas vancomycin does not. We have investigated persistence of fidaxomicin and vancomycin on C. difficile spores, and examined post-antibiotic exposure spore recovery, outgrowth and toxin production

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call