Abstract

To examine whether fast ripples (FRs) are an accurate marker of the epileptogenic zone, we analyzed overnight stereo-EEG recordings from 43 patients and hypothesized that FR resection ratio, maximal FR rate, and FR distribution predict postsurgical seizure outcome. We detected FRs automatically from an overnight recording edited for artifacts and visually from a 5-minute period of slow-wave sleep. We examined primarily the accuracy of removing ≥50% of total FR events or of channels with FRs to predict postsurgical seizure outcome (Engel class I = good, classes II-IV = poor) according to the whole-night and 5-minute analysis approaches. Secondarily, we examined the association of low overall FR rates or absence or incomplete resection of 1 dominant FR area with poor outcome. The accuracy of outcome prediction was highest (81%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 67%-92%) with the use of the FR event resection ratio and whole-night recording (vs 72%, 95% CI 56%-85%, for the visual 5-minute approach). Absence of channels with FR rates >6/min (p = 0.001) and absence or incomplete resection of 1 dominant FR area (p < 0.001) were associated with poor outcome. FRs are accurate in predicting epilepsy surgery outcome at the individual level when overnight recordings are used. Absence of channels with high FR rates or absence of 1 dominant FR area is a poor prognostic factor that may reflect suboptimal spatial sampling of the epileptogenic zone or multifocality, rather than an inherently low sensitivity of FRs. This study provides Class II evidence that FRs are accurate in predicting epilepsy surgery outcome.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.