Abstract

Wrong-patient order entry (WPOE) errors have a high potential for harm; these errors are particularly frequent wherever workflows are complex and multitasking and interruptions are common, such as in the emergency department (ED). Previous research shows that interruptive solutions, such as electronic patient verification forms or alerts, can reduce these types of errors but may be time-consuming and cause alert fatigue. To evaluate whether the use of noninterruptive display of patient photographs in the banner of the electronic health record (EHR) is associated with a decreased rate of WPOE errors. In this cohort study, data collected as part of care for patients visiting the ED of a large tertiary academic urban hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, between July 1, 2017, and June 31, 2019, were analyzed. In a quality improvement initiative, the ED staff encouraged patients to have their photographs taken by informing them of the intended safety impact. The rate of WPOE errors (measured using the retract-and-reorder method) for orders placed when the patient's photograph was displayed in the banner of the EHR vs the rate for patients without a photograph displayed. The primary analysis focused on orders placed in the ED; a secondary analysis included orders placed in any care setting. A total of 2 558 746 orders were placed for 71 851 unique patients (mean [SD] age, 49.2 [19.1] years; 42 677 (59.4%) female; 55 109 (76.7%) non-Hispanic). The risk of WPOE errors was significantly lower when the patient's photograph was displayed in the EHR (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.89). After this risk was adjusted for potential confounders using multivariable logistic regression, the effect size remained essentially the same (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.52-0.61). Risk of error was significantly lower in patients with higher acuity levels and among patients whose race was documented as White. This cohort study suggests that displaying patient photographs in the EHR provides decision support functionality for enhancing patient identification and reducing WPOE errors while being noninterruptive with minimal risk of alert fatigue. Successful implementation of such a program in an ED setting involves a modest financial investment and requires appropriate engagement of patients and staff.

Highlights

  • Wrong-patient order entry (WPOE) represents an important type of error

  • The risk of WPOE errors was significantly lower when the patient’s photograph was displayed in the electronic health record (EHR)

  • Risk of error was significantly lower in patients with higher acuity levels and among patients whose race was documented as White

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wrong-patient order entry (WPOE) represents an important type of error. Strategies used to reduce WPOE have focused on improving patient identification by interrupting practitioners during electronic order entry These strategies include a patient verification alert or an electronic form in which the practitioner must enter certain patient identifiers (eg, medical record number or first and last initials) to confirm the patient’s identity.[1,2] Alerts can include warnings about patients with similar names because this issue is associated with a higher risk of WPOE errors.[8] these interruptive solutions risk slowing practitioners’ workflow, and multiple exposures to electronic alerts can reduce the practitioners’ engagement with the alerts, known as alert fatigue.[9] noninterruptive solutions for enhancing patient identification and reducing wrong-patient errors, if effective, would be desirable and important

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.