Abstract

Changes in financial incentives have led to more patients being discharged home than to institutional forms of postacute care, such as skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), after elective lower extremity total joint replacement (LEJR). To evaluate the association of this change with hospital readmissions, surgical complications, and mortality. This cohort study used cross-temporal propensity-matching to identify 104 828 adult patients who were discharged home following LEJR between 2016 and 2018 (after changes in financial incentives) and 84 121 adult patients discharged to institutional forms of postacute care (eg, SNFs) between 2011 and 2013 (before changes in financial incentives). A difference-in-differences design was used to compare differences in outcomes between these groups to a propensity-matched group of patients discharged to institutional postacute care in both periods. Data were collected from Pennsylvania all-payer claims database, which includes all surgical procedures and hospitalizations across payers and hospitals in Pennsylvania. Data were analyzed between August 2019 and February 2020. Type of postacute care (home, including home with home health vs institutional postacute care, including SNF, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and long-term acute care hospitals). Main outcomes were 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions, LEJR complication rates, and mortality rates. Of 189 949 patients, 113 981 (60.0%) were women, and 83 444 (43.9%) were aged 40 to 64 years. The rate of discharge home increased from 63.6% (54 097 of 85 121) in 2011 to 2013 to 78.4% (82 199 of 104 828) in 2016 to 2018. In the adjusted difference-in-differences comparison, matched patients discharged home in 2016 to 2018 had significantly lower 30-day (difference, -2.9%; 95% CI, -4.2% to -1.6%) and 90-day (difference, -3.9%; 95% CI, -5.8% to -2.0%) readmission rates compared with similar patients sent to institutional postacute care in 2011 to 2013. Surgical complication and mortality rates were unchanged. Results were similar across payers and across hospital bundled payment participation status. In this cohort study, increases in discharges home following LEJR surgery did not seem to be associated with increased harm during a period in which changes in financial incentives likely spurred observed changes in postacute care.

Highlights

  • What level of postacute care support is provided to patients after elective lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) is an increasingly important clinical and policy issue

  • In the adjusted difference-in-differences comparison, matched patients discharged home in 2016 to 2018 had significantly lower 30-day and 90-day readmission rates compared with similar patients sent to institutional postacute care in 2011 to 2013

  • Results were similar across payers and across hospital bundled payment participation status. In this cohort study, increases in discharges home following LEJR surgery did not seem to be associated with increased harm during a period in which changes in financial incentives likely spurred observed changes in postacute care

Read more

Summary

Introduction

What level of postacute care support is provided to patients after elective lower extremity joint replacement (LEJR) is an increasingly important clinical and policy issue. Prior evaluations have identified the consequences of individual programs, it is likely that patient care patterns changed more broadly during this period, for postacute care. These changes may extend to other payers, hospitals, and outpatient surgery centers performing LEJR who may not be participating in bundled payments, but these effects are not well described. The totality of how health reform efforts on LEJR affected postacute care patterns remains unknown

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call