Association of clinical characteristics and biomarkers with recurrent atrial fibrillation after hybrid ablation

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Atrial fibrillation ablation research at our institution was supported by an unrestricted grant from AtriCure. Background Hybrid ablation is an alternative treatment for both persisting and therapy-resistant, symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), combining the strengths of endocardial catheter and epicardial surgical ablation. Although results exhibit lower rates of recurrence and higher reduction of AF burden, there is a considerable risk of procedure-related complications. Therefore, the identification of patient groups who benefit most of this procedure can help in pre-procedural selection and tailoring of optimal therapy post-ablation. Purpose This study aimed to identify clinical factors and blood biomarkers associated with recurrence of AF within 1 year post-ablation. Methods A total of 96 consecutive patients undergoing hybrid ablation between January 2015 and December 2018 in a tertiary care center were enrolled. Blood samples were collected pre-ablation. Seven biomarkers [Bone Morphogenetic Protein 10 (BMP10), angiopoietin-2 (ANG2), Dickkopf WNT Signaling Pathway Inhibitor 3 (DKK3), Endothelial Cell Specific Molecule 1 (ESM1), Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23), Insulin Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 7 (IGFBP7) and total N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)] were assayed at Roche Diagnostics based on their possible association with recurrence of AF. Clinical follow-up visits combined with 12-lead ECG and 24-hour Holter monitoring were scheduled at 3, 6 and 12 months post-procedure. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to study the association with recurrence of AF. Results Out of the 96 patients (mean age 58±8 years; 18% women), 17 (17.7%) developed recurrence of AF within 1 year post-ablation. Median time to diagnosis was 191 days (range: 92-344). Comparisons between patients with and without recurrence of AF are depicted in Table 1. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, adjusted for sex, showed that older age (HR 1.104, 95% CI 1.003-1.215, p=0.043), type of AF (HR 0.322, 95% CI 0.117-0.886, p=0.028), a history of peripheral vascular disease (HR 13.84, 95% CI 3.13-61.14, p<0.001) and recurrence in the blanking period (HR 14.25, 95% CI 3.99-50.85, p<0.001) were associated with recurrence of AF within 1 year post-ablation, but no blood biomarkers (Figure 1). Conclusion In AF patients undergoing extensive ablation, older age, type of AF, a history of peripheral vascular disease and recurrence in the blanking period were determinants of AF recurrence within 1 year post-ablation.