Abstract

Cardiovascular risk can be calculated using the Framingham cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk score and provides a risk stratification from mild to very high CVD risk percentage over 10 years. This equation represents a complex interaction between age, gender, cholesterol status, blood pressure, diabetes status, and smoking. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a measure of how the autonomic nervous system (ANS) modulates the heart rate. HRV measures are sensitive to age, gender, disease status such as diabetes and hypertension and processes leading to atherosclerosis. We investigated whether HRV measures are a suitable, simple, noninvasive alternative to differentiate between the four main Framingham associated CVD risk categories. In this study we applied the tone-entropy (T-E) algorithm and complex correlation measure (CCM) for analysis of HRV obtained from 20 min. ECG recordings and correlated the HRV score with the stratification results using the Framingham risk equation. Both entropy and CCM had significant analysis of variance (ANOVA) results [F(172, 3) = 9.51; <0.0001]. Bonferroni post hoc analysis indicated a significant difference between mild, high and very high cardiac risk groups applying tone-entropy (p < 0.01). CCM detected a difference in temporal dynamics of the RR intervals between the mild and very high CVD risk groups (p < 0.01). Our results indicate a good agreement between the T-E and CCM algorithm and the Framingham CVD risk score, suggesting that this algorithm may be of use for initial screening of cardiovascular risk as it is noninvasive, economical and easy to use in clinical practice.

Highlights

  • Identification of the risk of a cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important attribute of preventative health care.THE FRAMINGHAM RISK EQUATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR RISK Multifactorial factors contribute to the increased risk of CVD

  • This study investigated whether T-E and complex correlation measure (CCM) are able to differentiate between ECG recordings obtained from four groups of Frontiers in Physiology | Computational Physiology and Medicine patients categorized according to their Framingham risk score (FRS) into mild, moderate, periods (RR intervals) are transformed into percentage index (PI)

  • From a clinical perspective determining the final Framingham risk score is based on analysis of blood samples, which is an invasive procedure and requires samples to be sent to a testing laboratory

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Identification of the risk of a cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important attribute of preventative health care.THE FRAMINGHAM RISK EQUATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR RISK Multifactorial factors contribute to the increased risk of CVD. HRV is influenced by the same factors as incorporated in the Framingham risk equation including age, gender, cholesterol, blood pressure, diabetes status and smoking.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.