Abstract

ObjectivesMalocclusions affect about two-thirds of the population and orthodontic treatment is justified in 65% of these. However, the associations between anterior and posterior occlusal plane (AOP, POP) inclinations and Angle classification are lacking.Patients and methodsIn a retrospective study, lateral cephalometric radiograph tracings of 230 previously untreated Caucasians, aged 13 to 49 years, yielded inclines of the bisector occlusal plane, AOP, and POP. All inclinations were referenced to the Sella-Nasion line and the Frankfort horizontal and were assigned to the Angle classification as well as skeletal groups (retrognathic, neutral, prognathic). Quantile regressions were calculated.ResultsIn the skeletal groups the angles between Sella-Nasion line and both AOP and POP were significantly different between the groups (p < 0.01), showing steep inclines in skeletal class II and flat inclines in skeletal class III. The angles Frankfort horizontal-to-POP and Frankfort horizontal-to-AOP showed the same trends but only the latter differed significantly between the groups (p = 0.02). Among the Angle groups, AOP inclinations did not differ significantly for both reference planes whereas POP inclinations were significantly different (p = 0.01 to Frankfort horizontal, p = 0.02 to Sella-Nasion). Angle class I patients showed the flattest POP.ConclusionOcclusal plane inclines, measured to Sella-Nasion, were more consistent than those referenced to Frankfort horizontal. Sella-Nasion related anterior and posterior occlusal plane inclinations were steep in skeletal class II and flat in skeletal class III patients over all quantiles. Using the Angle classification, anterior and posterior occlusal plane inclinations did not follow this principle.

Highlights

  • Malocclusions affect approximately two thirds of the population and orthodontic treatment can be justified in up to 65% of malocclusions [4, 19, 29]

  • Between-group differences of Q1 and Q3 ranged from 0–3° (Angle classification) and 0.5–6°

  • In the present study significant between-group differences of Frankfort horizontal (FH)-AOP, sella-nasion line (SN)-AOP, and SN-POP confirmed what Fushima et al [7] and Tanaka and Sato [28] had found for the POP in their skeletal groups: steep POP in skeletal class II, flat POP in skeletal class III

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Malocclusions affect approximately two thirds of the population and orthodontic treatment can be justified in up to 65% of malocclusions [4, 19, 29]. For a better characterization of the sagittal curve of occlusion [17], Fushima et al [7] divided the maxillary occlusal plane at the cusp tip of the maxillary second premolar into anterior and posterior occlusal planes (AOP, POP). Their inclinations were referenced to the Frankfort horizontal (FH) and showed a significantly steep POP in girls with skeletal class II

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call