Abstract
e17115 Background: To evaluate the prognosis of BRCA mutation carriers compared to non-carriers and to demonstrate whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers present similar survival patterns among endometrial carcinomas. Methods: This data was from NCI Cancer Genome Atlas endometrial cancer database (TCGA) with pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 (58) or BRCA2 (77) or BRCA1and BRCA2 coexisted mutation (40) and non-mutation (461). We compared clinicopathologic features and prognosis of patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 or BRCA1and BRCA2 coexisted mutation. Survival time was analyzed for the combined data using Cox proportional hazard models with BRCA1and BRCA2 as time-varying covariates. Results: We found histologic types of patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation presented more progressive than non-carriers ( p = 0.029, p= 0.029, respectively). BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were detected to be associated with younger patients at diagnosis ( p = 0.036, p = 0.001, respectively). BRCA2 mutation carrier was identified more advanced stage than BRCA non-carriers. Compared to patients with BRCA1 mutation, the body mass index is higher in non-carriers. Before around 100 months survival, BRCA2 mutation carriers had the most favorable overall survival (OS). OS rate of all patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation was higher than non-carriers. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers had similar OS. Around 100 months later, BRCA1 carriers had more favorable OS than patients with BRCA2 mutation, BRCA1 / BRCA2 coexisted mutation and non-carriers ( p < 0.001). Patients with BRCA2 mutation had the most favorable progression-free survival (PFS), following by BRCA1 and BRCA2 coexisted mutation and BRCA2 alteration carriers ( p= 0.011). BRCA non-carriers had the worst PFS and OS all the time. Conclusions: BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers have favorable overall survival and progression-free survival among patients with endometrial carcinoma. [Table: see text]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.