Abstract
Anthropometric methods involving measurement of weight-for-height, height-for-age, weight-for-age, and mid-upper arm circumference have been extensively researched to identify an appropriate method of monitoring infant and child growth. Many countries have adopted weight for age as the main practical method. The Malawi Ministry of Health introduced weight for age based upon WHO recommended standards as a growth indicator in 1973. There are, however, difficulties in making the practice widely used at community level. In the present study, confined to the four urban areas of Malawi, a comparison was made between the weight-for-age (W/A) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) measurements. A very good correlation was observed between the two methods of screening for identification of undernourished children from 4 months of age onwards. Correct use of MUAC was found to be as effective as W/A in detecting undernutrition.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
