Abstract

To examine the association between types of loneliness (transient, incident, and chronic) and the risk of functional disability. Data were from the Health and Retirement Study 2006/2008-2016/2018. A total of 7,148 adults aged ≥50 was included. Functional status was measured by activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Loneliness was assessed using the 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale. We defined loneliness as no/transient/incident/chronic loneliness based on the pattern and duration of loneliness across 2006/2008 and 2010/2012. We applied multivariate Cox proportional hazard models with the new-onset ADL/IADL disability as outcome. Overall, 69.3% respondents showed no loneliness; while 10.3%, 8.9%, and 11.5% showed transient, incident, and chronic loneliness, respectively. A total of 1,298 (18.16%) and 1,260 (17.63%) functionally normal respondents developed ADL and IADL disability during 36,294 person-years of follow-up, respectively. After adjusting for socio-demographic, behavioral, and health factors, chronic loneliness was associated with higher risks of ADL (hazard ratio [HR]=1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.16-1.63, p <0.001, χ2=3.60, degree of freedom [df]=1) and IADL disability (HR=1.25, 95% CI=1.09-1.44, p=0.002, χ2=3.17, df=1) compared to no loneliness. By contrast, no significant associations between transient loneliness and ADL (HR=1.17, 95% CI=0.88-1.57, p=0.273, χ2=1.10, df=1) or IADL disability (HR=1.16, 95% CI=0.97-1.39, p=0.112, χ2=1.59, df=1) were found. Chronic loneliness was not associated with the risk of IADL disability in men (HR=1.13, 95% CI=0.91-1.40, p=0.263, χ2=1.12, df=1). Chronic loneliness, rather than transient loneliness, is an independent risk factor for functional disability in middle-aged and older adults, especially for women.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call