Abstract

Background: Although ribosomal protein S6 kinases, 90 kDa, polypeptide 3 (RSK2, RPS6KA3) has been reported to play an important role in cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, including breast cancer, its clinical implication in primary breast cancer patients is not well understood, and there were not many studies to explore the relationship between RSK2 and breast cancer on a clinical level. Methods: A systematic series matrix file search uploaded from January 1, 2008 to November 31, 2017 was undertaken using ArrayExpress and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Search filters were breast cancer, RNA assay, and array assay. Files eligible for inclusion met the following criteria: a) sample capacity is over 100, b) tumor sample comes from unselected patient’s primary breast tumor tissue, and c) expression of RSK2 and any clinical parameters of patients were available from the files. We use median as the cutoff value to assess the association between the expression of RSK2 and the clinical indexes of breast cancer patients. Finding: The meta-analysis identified 13 series matrix files from GEO database involving 3,122 samples that come from patients’ primary breast cancer tissue or normal tissue. The expression of RSK2 in tumor tissues is lower than that in normal tissues [odds ratio (OR), 0.54; 95% credible interval (CI), 0.44–0.67; Cochran’s Q test p = 0.14; I 2 = 41.7%]. Patients with a high expression of RSK2 showed more favorable overall survival [hazard ratio (HR), 0.71; 95% CI, 0.49–0.94; Cochran’s Q test p = 0.95; I 2 = 0.0%] and less potential of distant metastasis (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41–0.87; Cochran’s Q test p = 0.88; I 2 = 0.0%) and lymph node infiltration (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65–0.998; Cochran’s Q test p = 0.09; I 2 = 42.8%). Besides, the expression of RSK2 in luminal breast cancer is lower than Cochran’s Q test p = 0.06; I 2 = 63.5%). RSK2 overexpression corresponded with higher histological grade (OR, 1.329; 95% CI, 1.03–1.721; Cochran’s Q test p = 0.69; I 2 = 0.0%). RSK2 expression is also associated with estrogen receptor (ER) and age. Conclusion: The meta-analysis provides evidence that RSK2 is a potential biomarker in breast cancer patients. The expression of RSK2 is distinctive in different intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer, indicating that it may play an important role in specific breast cancer. Further study is needed to uncover the mechanism of RSK2 in breast cancer. Systematic Review Registration: (website), identifier (registration number).

Highlights

  • Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer among women

  • Clinical stage of GSE20685 was not available, which we estimated depending on the T, N, and M stage shown in the GSE file using the NCCN guidelines of breast cancer

  • Data in GSE39004 were only used for comparing RSK2 expression between normal tissues and tumor tissues, because its tumor sample size is not large enough

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Data from the World Health Organization shows that breast cancer impacts over 1.5 million women each year and causes the greatest number of cancer-related deaths among women. There has been a breakthrough in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer in the past few years, leading to the 5-years relative survival rate rising to 90%, the majority of breast cancer patients with distant metastasis succumb to cancer progression within 5 years (Siegel et al, 2018). Several molecular subtypes of breast cancer have been classified depending on their molecular characteristics (Perou et al, 2000), and each individual subtype corresponds to a different underlying biology, survival rate, and response to therapy (Prat et al, 2015; Nielsen et al, 2017). Ribosomal protein S6 kinases, 90 kDa, polypeptide 3 (RSK2, RPS6KA3) has been reported to play an important role in cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, including breast cancer, its clinical implication in primary breast cancer patients is not well understood, and there were not many studies to explore the relationship between RSK2 and breast cancer on a clinical level

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call