Abstract

The conclusions from the multiple randomized clinical trials exploring the relationship between development of intussusception and rotavirus vaccination among neonates and infants have been controversial. To evaluate the association between rotavirus vaccination and risk of intussusception. For this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2018, using no language restrictions. The search terms were rotavirus or RV (rotavirus vaccine) or HRV (human rotavirus vaccine), vaccin*, and intussusception. Randomized clinical trials of neonates and infants that compared the risk of intussusception after the vaccination with a placebo group were included. A fixed-effects model was used to pool the data. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with Q test and I2 statistic; relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), and 95% CIs were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The main outcome was the diagnosis of intussusception in the analysis. The pooled and subtotal results of RR, RD, and 95% CI for the risk of intussusception were estimated at 31 days, 1 year, and 2 years after vaccination. A total of 25 randomized clinical trials including 200 594 participants (104 647 receiving vaccine and 95 947 receiving placebo) in 33 countries from 4 continents were included in this meta-analysis. Twenty cases of definite intussusception were diagnosed within 31 days after rotavirus vaccination, with 11 cases (55%) in the vaccine group and 9 cases (45%) in the placebo group (RD, 0.17 per 10 000 infants [95% CI, -1.16 to 1.50 per 10 000 infants], P = .80; RR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.49 to 2.64], P = .77). Seventy-four cases were reported within 1 year, with 37 cases (50%) in the vaccine group and 37 cases (50%) in the placebo group (RD, -0.65 per 10 000 infants [95% CI, -2.68 to 1.39 per 10 000 infants], P = .53; RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.32], P = .45). Fifty-nine cases were reported within 2 years, with 29 cases (49%) in the vaccine group and 30 cases (51%) in the placebo group (RD, -0.48 per 10 000 infants [95% CI, -3.64 to 2.69 per 10 000 infants], P = .77; RR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.55 to 1.52], P = .73). Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that monovalent, pentavalent, monovalent human-bovine, oral bovine pentavalent, and human neonatal rotavirus vaccination was not associated with an elevated risk of intussusception among neonates or infants.

Highlights

  • Vaccines play an important role in the prevention of infectious diseases

  • Twenty cases of definite intussusception were diagnosed within 31 days after rotavirus vaccination, with 11 cases (55%) in the vaccine group and 9 cases (45%) in the placebo group (RD, 0.17 per 10 000 infants [95% CI, −1.16 to 1.50 per 10 000 infants], P = .80; relative risk (RR), 1.14 [95% CI, 0.49 to 2.64], P = .77)

  • Seventy-four cases were reported within 1 year, with 37 cases (50%) in the vaccine group and 37 cases (50%) in the placebo group (RD, −0.65 per 10 000 infants [95% CI, −2.68 to 1.39 per 10 000 infants], P = .53; RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.32], P = .45)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rotavirus (RV) vaccination has significantly reduced the occurrence and severity of RV-related gastroenteritis and mortality among infants and young children.[1] data from some clinical trials show that the efficacy of RV vaccines for prevention of RV gastroenteritis reaches 36% to 96% within a year of follow-up,[2,3] the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety has noted that the use of RV vaccines may be associated with an increased risk of intussusception.[4] Even though the efficacy of the vaccine might outweigh the small potential risk of intussusception, the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety has suggested performance of active surveillance to ensure that the long-term benefit and safety of RV vaccines are entirely assessed.[4]. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of published RCTs to further assess the risk of development of intussusception after RV vaccination

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call