Abstract

Motor development is an inseparable component of cognitive development. So, to develop the mind, it is necessary to work the body. Therefore, Early Childhood Education curricula and the scientific literature emphasize the need to promote the development of motor skills during the 1st years of life. These skills are necessary for learning and subsequent academic performance. However, studies frequently offer only a partial view of these relationships. Few works have analyzed the specific relationships between different components of preschool gross and fine motor skills and subsequent performance on different academic competencies. Further, they present discrepant results. The aim of this study was to determinate which specific components of gross and fine motor skills assessed in Spanish students during the final year of Early Childhood Education (5 to 6-year-olds) were associated with different academic competencies assessed in the following academic year, when the students were in their 1st year of Primary Education. The final sample consisted of 38 Spanish students, aged 5. A mixed methods approach was used. It consisted of systematic observation to assess specific components of gross and fine motor skills when children were in the Early Childhood Education period, and selective methodology to evaluate their academic competencies (specifically in literacy and mathematics and overall), 1 year later, once in Primary Education. Multiple linear regression models were constructed using the computing language R to examine the association between motor skills and academic competencies. The results indicated that only the components of fine motor skills showed associations with academic competencies. The pattern of association varied when literacy and mathematics competencies were specifically and individually assessed and when overall academic competency was considered. The two assessed fine motor skills (Coordination and Integration) were associated with literacy competency (β = 0.344, p = 0.025; β = 0.349, p = 0.024, respectively) and overall academic competency (β = 0.267, p = 0.065; β = 0.493, p = 0.001, respectively). However, only Integration was associated with mathematics competency (β = 0.476, p = 0.002). The “Discussion” section focuses on the educational implications of these results and future research. It highlights the importance of early assessment of fine motor skills to identify students likely to present inadequate subsequent academic performance and the need to apply instruction and interventions tailored to the specific needs of each child.

Highlights

  • Diverse development theories and numerous authors have highlighted the relationship existing between motor and cognitive development (Frick and Möhring, 2016)

  • The main goal of this study was to determine which specific preschool gross and fine motor skills assessed in Spanish students enrolled in the last year of Early Childhood Education (ECE) (5–6 years) were associated with later academic competencies assessed over the following academic year, when students were in their 1st year of Primary Education

  • As mentioned in the Introduction section, evidence suggests that certain brain structures are responsible for motor and cognitive functions (Diamond, 2000, 2007; Grissmer et al, 2010; Pitchford et al, 2016), our findings suggest that this does not guarantee that all specific motor skills scores are significantly associated with all academic competencies score (Chagas et al, 2016)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Diverse development theories and numerous authors have highlighted the relationship existing between motor and cognitive development (Frick and Möhring, 2016). Piaget (1936, 1970, 1973) suggested that bodily action prepares logical operations, since logic is based on the coordination of actions, prior to being formulated on the language plane. He established sensory-motor or practical intelligence as the base of verbal or reflexive intelligence. Pelicier et al (1996) stated that motor and psychological functions are the two fundamental elements of human behavior They develop together, later being specialized and differentiated, they continue to be subject to reciprocal interactions (Adolph and Franchak, 2017; Kim et al, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.